City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Because all of United’s debt is commercial, much of it via the initial leveraged purchase, but more still from subsequent loan restructuring and cash injections. The Glazers have not used shareholder loans to finance club operations, as that comes with a set of risks they most certainly would not wish to assume. I believe they have effectively made equity investments their public listing in the US, which as supported further leveraging of operations.

This isn’t a sign of good management, though. They’ve saddled United with significant debt servicing obligations and continually extract value from the club whenever possible.

What about Scruffy Jim’s cash injection to reduce the debt?
 
Dickheads exposing their mental capacity for the world to see…
The Judges’ comments are damning.. just as they were in the CAS case. The haters can try to spin it as much as they want but the tone and content of these statements from two independent panels speak for themselves.
 
I'm sure North West tonight
Just said City have failed in their bid to get the ATP Case won and it's Directly linked to 115?
Did anyone else hear this
1 min ago?
He said we've failed in the majority of our legal challenges against the PL's ownership and sponsorship rules (ownership?) - disingenuous bastard - and then went on to add that it isn't directly related to the 115 charges
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.