These divs could not even organise a boycott of one of their games.This is just giving us a little sample of how immense the piss boiling is going to be when found not guilty next spring, it's going to be glorious
View attachment 134310
I quoted GDM ("Top Lawyer & City fan") on there - and he got lots of likes!I see some have “borrowed” this for twitter
I’m proud
That is how I see it.As someone who is just catching up..
Am I correct to summarise - that the APT rules need to be voted back through (with a majority) to be legally implemented, but in doing so they have to include share holder loans?
If so the 9 clubs with shareholders loans will likely be reassessed? So basically this won't be voted back in, unless there is an agreement that prior loans are excluded?
Kicker.de German football site say City have won their case.
They might be a bit more cautious in the way they report the 115 case. Most pundits have been burned twice now. Once at UEFA and once with the PL. I think the Times and Mail have already softened their position towards City.Seriously embarrassing moment for that industry
And the millions pumped into the Arsenal from the Rwandan tourist board, where we can’t even send criminal illegal migrants (for free)Nothing against you personally. We're just a bit miffed that while we have been growing our club organically based on increasing revenues due to success on the pitch your owners have been financially doping pumping money into arsenal in the form of interest free 'loans'. Coupled with your dubious links to Emirates this is middle east sports washing at its worst. The game is gone.
It will surprise no one that the law expert quoted on the BBC article is an Arsenal fan, Simon Leaf.
Very sharpI’m going to wait until Der Spegiel give us the inside story !
Is there any suggestion of why they’ve done that? Makes no sense at face valueThey have sat on this decision for 14 days.