City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

remember arthur mann said:
It would be nice to get some compo, knowing it would come out of the rags,dippers and arse funding.
Click to expand...
Hmmmm Compo...?

Wouldn't it be absolutely delicious if the Arse finished 2 points ahead of us in the Prem but were deducted 5 points due to their interest free sharholders loans and failing PSR.

Obviously it wouldn't be good to finish with less points than them but if that were to happen, wow that would be karma.
 
The Light Was Yellow Sir said:
Not really. The interest on the loan would have to appear on the submission but that’ll likely be very little, and that assumes the loan isn’t transferred to equity which will, in effect, make it disappear.
Click to expand...
If equity investment is allowed why would we go to the trouble of inflating sponsorship deals to be accused of disguised equity?
 
manimanc said:
Just read an absolute whopper of an article from sky's Rob Harris about yesterday.

news.sky.com

Man City and Premier League both claim victory in legal battle over rules on commercial deals

The case is separate to the 115 charges facing City under Premier League rules, which they allegedly breached by failing to provide accurate financial information over a nine-year period.
news.sky.com news.sky.com

Absolutely nothing to do with what the outcome was.
Click to expand...
It is? Although it doesn't mention the two deals with Etihad and FADB that were deemed to have been unfairly blocked.

​

 
bridgeno1 said:
Where I understand City might have the biggest issues are some allegations around City execs misrepresenting owner funding as sponsorship income. Anyway I'm far from an expert on this and it's only based on some things I've heard which are just as likely to be bollocks as not so please don't take this as my personal opinion, only a response to what I've heard are possibly the toughest of the 115 charges for City to overcome.
Click to expand...
The problem is, so called “friendly” fans like you DONT understand yet keep repeating the rubbish they’ve “only” heard.

Thats what pisses us off
 
bridgeno1 said:
Whether they do or not I don't know. But there's a difference between a club's hierarchy and its fans. I've been getting dogs abuse on here (it's fine I'm thick skinned and I'm on a Man City forum after all so it's a case of Alice isn't in Kansas any more) but I'm not a representative of Arsenal Football Club I'm just a fan and have been my whole life so I think it would be cool if people could make that distinction. Making things personal isn't cool.
Click to expand...
No it isnt but as i have said before and also raised it with regards to the press, alot of people love this club, they have family bonds, life long friendships attached to it, outside of family this club is the most important thing to some people, they organise their work, holidays, general life around the matches so when you attack it , it doesnt get much more personal than that, so it has to be respected.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.