Dribble
Well-Known Member
This is the key. It's my understanding that in order to compete in the PL, the 20 stakeholders agree that no litigation against the PL can be taken against the league in the UK or European law courts, unless it concerns the actual complaints process, but NOT the substance of the complaint.The question I have is that if the tribunal have found certain aspects of the PSR and APT rules to be unlawful, how did this come to pass ?
The PL had sought legal advice before drafting the rules , were they implemented despite the legal advice or was the legal advice simply wrong
It all points to a set of rules that have been curated and pushed through by a certain number of clubs specifically targeted at City, and probably more prominently, Newcastle
This surely has a bearing on the 115 case , setting our stall out that there are rules specifically targeted at our club that were unlawful
This essentially makes the PL judge, jury & executioner, hence why the Red Top Mafia can unduly influence PL rules to their advantage, & there's nothing the other stakeholders can do about it.
I sense City were very serious when Khaldoon warned in 2014/15 that we'd reluctantly "take a pinch", but the next time they come at us, we'd rather spend £30m on the world's best lawyers, than pay UEFA or the PL another penny in fines.
I'm fuckin glad we've taken the gloves off, & put the knuckle-dusters & bovver boots on!