It's self-evident that the cartel running the PL want their protection racket rules to stay in place, question is how long they'll stick around when its gone?
So am I missing something here,
It's Okay for owners to loan their clubs £500million interest-free or charge 6% and then add it to the club's debts. But they want to stop Sponsorship deal investments, so the clubs' debt rises, and then it takes the club's market value down by £500million. OK, that sounds like a great idea for football.
So if our owners want to loan us £1billion it is OK, But if our owners agree on a major deal with a large leading company to Sponsors us it is wrong, Even if our owners did have links to that company and it's a major brand trading legally then it's still a legal business that has to produces annual revenue figures that show that sponsorship deal.
It's full-on Prejudice by the Premier League, WHY not go full on back ball in the bag system with its members voting,