journolud
Well-Known Member
More like a group of sixth formers have pushed their fag into taking on a pro boxer. Masters is a lickspittle you give him far too much credit describing him as a bully
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Unfortunately all future hire has to bow down to the red cunts and daniel “ the dildo in a jar” levy. This fuckinng vicious cycle will never end.Noel calling for masters head in the mail!
Gallagher wrote: 'It has become clear that HE is merely a mouthpiece for the red Cartel. He has targeted and continues to target those that will shape the future of English football on behalf of those that are trapped in the past.'
Every little helps -:)
Apparently they don't need 14 votes,previous vote was 12-6 with two abstentions,vote passed.So that reads two thirds of the positive/negative votes.It is, or it isn't being changed next year. Nothing is finalised yet and they still need 14 votes.
And about Newcastle, there are RPT rules that are perfectly legal without the rest of the nonsense.
If the vote had been 2-1 with 17 abstentions would the vote have been carried?
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,321
Do they? Not sure they'll get away with that again this timeUnfortunately all future hire has to bow down to the red cunts and daniel “ the dildo in a jar” levy. This fuckinng vicious cycle will never end.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 13,321
It is two thirds - seldom get people abstaining, so it's commonly seen as needing 14 votes to pass.Apparently they don't need 14 votes,previous vote was 12-6 with two abstentions,vote passed.So that reads two thirds of the positive/negative votes.
If the vote had been 2-1 with 17 abstentions would the vote have been carried?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
You know me well enough to know it’s fully deserved if I’m touchy with someone.Touchy
Didn’t you once say he had the sense of humour of a peanut? That did make me chuckle. Especially as peanuts are the least amusing of nuts.
Am I right in thinking that UEFA require the calculation of interest on loans to be at market rates, even if the actual loan is not?Note:
UEFA FFP regs don't explicitly mention loans, but they do limit the costs that clubs can count towards income. The costs that are counted include transfers, employee benefits, amortization of transfers, finance costs, and dividends. Infrastructure, training facilities, and youth development are not counted.
Now UEFA are changing the rules to a squad / income ratio next season but if the owner loans are charged interest this season then Liverpool and Arsenal are in shit street.
bit worried about the friends we have, 8 clubs worked with PL against us, red cartel the main enemies but the other 5 dont like us either.
then Che, New, Eve supported us, so that leaves 8 teams who might on the fence to decide which way to lean.
Spurs surprise not in the 8 in this APT case trying to throw us under the bus, but you can bet Levy happy with any negative outcome on City so I would say 9 against us, 3 with us and maybe Forest so its 9 vs 5 with 6 clubs still to decide 3 of them promoted ones, and other three some of these 6 might abstain again on any big decision like happened in past. meaning even 11-12 votes could be enough.
we deffo not have numbers to push through some rules we want to happen and its a tight thing to even stop some rules being voted we dont want.
we are really hated and many have been brainwashed about City, Newcastle and Arab owners in general. lot of owners in lesser clubs dont wanna here a promoted team having rich owners ready to invest and stay in PL for 5-10 years rather than be a club that relegates soon after promotion. Newcastle pose danger for both set of teams, they are overtaking teams fighting for 7-8-9-10. with potential to overtake 3-4-5-6th as well instead of the mainly 13-18. places they did in Ashley era.
and they rather stop us then not cement in current status quo, and happy to play second fiddle to red cartel for cosy 7th-15th places year in year out. we re asking team to have dreams and bit of risk when they dont have any ambition, dreams just pure self interest and the safe option currently available.
Newcastle currently great example of the rules in work, they would need further serious investment in the squad to really take on CL teams and continued investment for years to challenge for title every season alongside great decisions made on staff, transfer etc. but they hit a limit, certainly could not properly spent to do this, they may add Guehi which would blow most of their available limit, but in the meantime their rivals can add much more quality money spent. nothing fair about this.
then Che, New, Eve supported us, so that leaves 8 teams who might on the fence to decide which way to lean.
Spurs surprise not in the 8 in this APT case trying to throw us under the bus, but you can bet Levy happy with any negative outcome on City so I would say 9 against us, 3 with us and maybe Forest so its 9 vs 5 with 6 clubs still to decide 3 of them promoted ones, and other three some of these 6 might abstain again on any big decision like happened in past. meaning even 11-12 votes could be enough.
we deffo not have numbers to push through some rules we want to happen and its a tight thing to even stop some rules being voted we dont want.
we are really hated and many have been brainwashed about City, Newcastle and Arab owners in general. lot of owners in lesser clubs dont wanna here a promoted team having rich owners ready to invest and stay in PL for 5-10 years rather than be a club that relegates soon after promotion. Newcastle pose danger for both set of teams, they are overtaking teams fighting for 7-8-9-10. with potential to overtake 3-4-5-6th as well instead of the mainly 13-18. places they did in Ashley era.
and they rather stop us then not cement in current status quo, and happy to play second fiddle to red cartel for cosy 7th-15th places year in year out. we re asking team to have dreams and bit of risk when they dont have any ambition, dreams just pure self interest and the safe option currently available.
Newcastle currently great example of the rules in work, they would need further serious investment in the squad to really take on CL teams and continued investment for years to challenge for title every season alongside great decisions made on staff, transfer etc. but they hit a limit, certainly could not properly spent to do this, they may add Guehi which would blow most of their available limit, but in the meantime their rivals can add much more quality money spent. nothing fair about this.
BlueDejong
Well-Known Member
HelloCity
Well-Known Member
"City's bullying behaviour" lol, it's like you've given your child permission to twat the school bullies because you've lost patience with the schools abject failure to deal with them and then the idiot parents of said bullies are crying their hearts out and demanding the school takes action with the level of bullying in the school.
In reality, they've just completely made that quote up to create a narrative they don't have the balls to come out with themselves.