Totally agree…the fact that Bond turned it around with Gow, Hutchinson and Macdonald proves we had a good basis initially….I think keeping Barnes, Owen and Hartford would have made the difference
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
TheThirdDeano
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 8,735
No, you’re right. They’re actually super positive for city!The press saying City have had some succeses is working against us?
My bad, I’m sorry!
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,018
Steffen ,on T/S was saying ,if City had a big win ,it would be obvious,because The Suits would have had to immediately change the rule book.
Bit disappointed after all the leaks ,was hoping for a" crash and burn " for them.Still hope springs eternal.
I understand what Stefan is saying but that would rely on the premier league being an organised competent regulator when there’s far more evidence that they aren’t.
Also he was an outstanding coach but a horrendous manager, so sad, one of the great characters in the clubs history, wonderful man.Thing is, that group of players was ageing. So it needed a few bold decisions. But Big Mal simply went postal.
They will all know, the PL has too many leaksMust be killing the other clubs that City know but they don’t…
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,264
They will all know, the PL has too many leaks
It's a strange situation.
If the PL leaks like a sieve, then all the clubs know. We know that a number of clubs leak like a sieve, so if they know anything positive for them, we would all know.
If the PL doesn't leak like a sieve, then none of the clubs know.
If it's a targeted leak from the PL, it will be to either a favoured club, or a favoured member of the press. Panja was coy, which makes me think it isn't the former. Ziegler has been non-commital, which makes me think it isn't the latter. Yet they all have to make some comment, any comment in an information vacuum.
I am still leaning towards no judgment being released yet. The coincidence of it happening right before a PL shareholders' meeting after three months, seems just too much to me.
I much preferred it when the PL did actually leak like a sieve and the press just repeated everything they were told :)
I wouldn't be surprised if Arsenal leaking the details of the tribunal really put the PL in a position they didn't want to be in, and they are being super careful now.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Yep. I get what Stefan is saying but it could be that he’s giving the PL far too much credit!I understand what Stefan is saying but that would rely on the premier league being an organised competent regulator when there’s far more evidence that they aren’t.
The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,415
- Team supported
- City
Knowing how the PL operate, Masters will have been informed, called a meeting with United and Liverpool, now rewriting the rule book to close off any ways of questioning them in the future.It's a strange situation.
If the PL leaks like a sieve, then all the clubs know. We know that a number of clubs leak like a sieve, so if they know anything positive for them, we would all know.
If the PL doesn't leak like a sieve, then none of the clubs know.
If it's a targeted leak from the PL, it will be to either a favoured club, or a favoured member of the press. Panja was coy, which makes me think it isn't the former. Ziegler has been non-commital, which makes me think it isn't the latter. Yet they all have to make some comment, any comment in an information vacuum.
I am still leaning towards no judgment being released yet. The coincidence of it happening right before a PL shareholders' meeting after three months, seems just too much to me.
I much preferred it when the PL did actually leak like a sieve and the press just repeated everything they were told :)
I wouldn't be surprised if Arsenal leaking the details of the tribunal really put the PL in a position they didn't want to be in, and they are being super careful now.
Some success.
Newman Noggs
Well-Known Member
It's a strange situation.
If the PL leaks like a sieve, then all the clubs know. We know that a number of clubs leak like a sieve, so if they know anything positive for them, we would all know.
If the PL doesn't leak like a sieve, then none of the clubs know.
If it's a targeted leak from the PL, it will be to either a favoured club, or a favoured member of the press. Panja was coy, which makes me think it isn't the former. Ziegler has been non-commital, which makes me think it isn't the latter. Yet they all have to make some comment, any comment in an information vacuum.
I am still leaning towards no judgment being released yet. The coincidence of it happening right before a PL shareholders' meeting after three months, seems just too much to me.
I much preferred it when the PL did actually leak like a sieve and the press just repeated everything they were told :)
I wouldn't be surprised if Arsenal leaking the details of the tribunal really put the PL in a position they didn't want to be in, and they are being super careful now.
I reckon all the clubs who were supposed to be fling evidence in support of the PL (if the reports were true) will already know the outcome or at least have an idea how it went. They will have been working closely with the PLs lawyers. The information coming out is sufficiently vague to have come from someone close to the case but not privy to the final Judgment.