Yep if you’re white you’re alright.It's racism and we say it is. It always was.
If you’re brown put them down.
We’ve (City) always known it was.
It all started at the very beginning with ‘these Arabs’
Yep if you’re white you’re alright.It's racism and we say it is. It always was.
It depends what you mean by fair? . Is it fair that utd can get a much bigger shirt sponsorship or Chervrolet deal that got the exec fired.
Spot on. City feel that the PL are riding roughshod over globally recognised accountancy rules - IAS24 - and that that is unlawful.Exactly - "related parties" is an established accountancy definition which is widely accepted whilst "associated parties" is a PL construct that they dreamt up. And that would appear to be the basis of the City claim - i.e. that it is just something dreamt up to hurt certain clubs.
125? did I miss a meeting?
Right, so what have I missed?
Tend to agree with some that this isn't promising; if we were confident of a positive outcome from the charges then I don't see why we'd have launched this lawsuit. Want it resolved one way or another as, being brutally honest, I can't be arsed with it all anymore. Sapping my love of football, and I'm glad I'm no longer as emotionally attached to it as I was in my early twenties. Whole thing is an attempt at reputational damage and I'd cry if it wasn't so risibly transparent.
Whatever the outcome, victory or demotion to Sunday league, I'll always have blue blood. But thank fuck I now have plenty of distractions in my life worthier than football.