So why were they on the agenda in the first place?Am I being pessimistic - Surely there is just no point discussing amendments to rules that are awaiting the verdict of a hearing?
Hope we’ve shagged them up the arse, however
So why were they on the agenda in the first place?Am I being pessimistic - Surely there is just no point discussing amendments to rules that are awaiting the verdict of a hearing?
Hope we’ve shagged them up the arse, however
Fair point. No idea. I may start getting excitedSo why were they on the agenda in the first place?
I agree if the rules allowed this it would be wrong. Total discrimination against right socks.I may have phrased that a bit wrong.
I don't really care where its coming from but i still agree the idea on having some rules from Etihad or similar sponsoring the left sock of every player for a billion quid a season etc. There's should be a middle ground in there that doesn't fuck everything up imo.
I also get the 'well fuck em' side as well, coz why not.
Lord Dyson , master of the rolls
Yeah thats my thinking. Just might be put off as could easily waste everyone’s time with the ongoing IC….Am I being pessimistic - Surely there is just no point discussing amendments to rules that are awaiting the verdict of a hearing?
Hope we’ve shagged them up the arse, however
SiSo in plain English is this in city’s favour yes or no
Tbf, he’d not get excited by a blow job from Margot Robbie
Then it wouldn’t have been tabled rather than axed last minute, surely?Yeah thats my thinking. Just might be put off as could easily waste everyone’s time with the ongoing IC….
Or they may have dropped to their knee’s and applied baby oil vigorously P Diddy style and we’ve won the battle