jamesha
Well-Known Member
Bit of wishful thinking?It won't be retrospectively applied. Any changes would apply moving forward.
Bit of wishful thinking?It won't be retrospectively applied. Any changes would apply moving forward.
Did they actually say that on BBC radio?BBC news on radio in Car “City lose against EPL”
Sky sports ticker tape City claim victory
And people can’t see how biased towards the istry clubs and against ours BBC are
Mind boggling
Good sick of hearing about them & their owner. I assume as he has won big he has also lost big too so hopefully today’s findings won’t be too much of a shock for him.That could really fuck up Brighton so we’ll see how the Brighton supporting finance guy reports it. He’s been disingenuous throughout.
I'm pretty sure whatever rules they bring in they will be "lawful". The PL can't afford another defeat like this one.
To be honest this probavly suits the scruffy yonner, Ineos has several offshoot companies he could realistically use to pump money into the club.Please tell me the rags have a MASSIVE amount of shareholder loans
The cowards haven't opened the comments section, either.Reading the BBC summary of it you'd think we lost.
Yes they did on BBC MancDid they actually say that on BBC radio?
If so, that is a new low, even for the BBC.
Bollocks. Take them for every penny then invest it into the club.There's a huge opportunity here for City to show the Premier League and our rivals up for what they are.
I would like to see a bold statement, to publicly acknowledge the findings and state that although we are entitled to damages, we will not be pursuing them. Advise that our only aim was to ensure a level playing field for all and suggest that we forego damages in the hope that these funds are reinvested into the grassroots level of the game.