Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Limited companies don't pay CGT they would pay corporation tax, but as you say there are ways of reducing that
City launch legal action against the Premier League
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
horlock_was_super
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 3,293
- Location
- In complete despair at 93:19
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
Only if that penny was earned ‘organically’, a properly thrice audited paper trail and signed off by two independent assessors approved by randomly appointed individuals from impartial sources.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Probably not the one but this is Stefan on 93:20 unfortunately it requires a sub
THE 93:20 PODCAST:- THE LAWYERS - 93:20
Ahsan is joined by legal expert Stefan to discuss yesterday's Times article, why City are at war with the PL and how this relates to the 115 charges. A must listen for all blues.
ninetythreetwenty.com
Brilliant.
Guilty, apologies.
For no reason whatsoever Macca appears to be a Male nickname!
I've thought this before and believe it's because blokes will have and use nicknames for mates for life whereas women don't generally.
Chelsea sell a hotel and pocket the profits, thus reducing their PSR deficit. This is perfectly legal at the time of the transaction. The PL do not approve it but try to pass a new rule to outlaw this type transaction. No doubt if the PL had won the vote, they would have withheld approval, thus effectively applying a new rule retrospectively.
It’s just bonkers, corrupt even. Maybe no sympathy for Chelsea, but you have to accept that they have pulled off a coup. One in the eye for the redshirts. If this had been one of them, you can bet the PL would have approved the transaction and subsequently tried to outlaw any other club doing the same thing.
Masters “Hi Liverpool and Arsenal, MUFC have sold a hotel to themselves. Do you have any plans to do the same?”
dippers and arse: “Yes.”
Masters:”Get on with it then so afterwards we can stop others doing this.”
Thanks.
Found it trawling back.
'Destroy the game? Nonsense' - Truth behind City's legal action
Man City Premier League legal action could be pivotal moment as wait goes on for 115 charges decision
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
jamesha
Well-Known Member
Given how successful the Premier League is both domestically and internationally I am surprised that no other clubs are challenging rules that crippling their plans to comply with some bizarre PSR rules.
For example, Villa should be strengthening their squad for the oncoming Champions League campaign rather than having to sell key players.
I do think that money in football is a bit crazy but the current versions of FFP, PSR etc. are more about propping up the history club cartels than sensible, fair financial controls.
For example, Villa should be strengthening their squad for the oncoming Champions League campaign rather than having to sell key players.
I do think that money in football is a bit crazy but the current versions of FFP, PSR etc. are more about propping up the history club cartels than sensible, fair financial controls.
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Our top brass must have been high fiving each other when this got leaked! We haven’t even stepped foot in the court room and we just landed a massive haymaker!