City launch legal action against the Premier League

[Colin Bells Boots]

That’s what the case is about, they can because the league voted for it. The panel will decide whether thats legal.

The influence of the redshirt/yank cartel within the PL needs to be destroyed and their power diminshed for the sake of every member team.

The clubs who blindly vote with them need to wake up !

 

[blueparrot]

The influence of the redshirt/yank cartel within the PL needs to be destroyed and their power diminshed for the sake of every member team.

The clubs who blindly vote with them need to wake up !

Maybe that’s true, but the case will be decided on its legality only and on any evidence of collusion we have. Maybe the result ,if we win, will make teams think twice in future vote, or maybe it won’t.

 

[WRicko]

I would love either the APT case or the 115 to shed more light on Chelsea hotel sale and United Covid losses take it Liverpool fake stadium was pre premier league financial rules

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Aren't the "independent valuation company" in a business relationship with Liverpool?

Their official candle partner?

 

[Champions again in 2012]

I would love either the APT case or the 115 to shed more light on Chelsea hotel sale and United Covid losses take it Liverpool fake stadium was pre premier league financial rules

But so was the Mancini contract but that doesn’t appear to have been an obstacle for the Premier League

 

[dadnlad]

I would love either the APT case or the 115 to shed more light on Chelsea hotel sale and United Covid losses take it Liverpool fake stadium was pre premier league financial rules

Well our trump up breaches are before PSR but don't let that get in way of good story for ssn

 

[BolinCell]

so how is that can PL decide what Etihad can pay us? just because they are a company from UAE same as our owner?
can they dictate what Puma might offer us if it upsets the red cartel?

that ruling is due in the next few weeks.

 

[Cobwebcat]

Winning the CL is worth nowt to sponsors according to the PL. Unbelievable. Only City. In what World? No wonder City had had enough.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Winning the CL is worth nowt to sponsors according to the PL. Unbelievable. Only City.

Pure cunts.

 

[Kinkys Left Foot]

I would suspect that our sponsorship deal value with Etihad contains incentive uplift values for achievements.
ie win the league - 10 million extra, win the CL - 15 million extra.
Clearly the PL have said that's somehow not allowed, yet its clearly included in the contract as a tangible additional asset to the sponsoring company bearing a value.
How the fuck do the PL think they can determine what that value is when it's a contractual condition between two commercial entities, no matter what their relationship is? How can they introduce rules that have seniority over properly stipulated contracted consideration value?
It seems maybe, they cannot!