El Boy Wonder
Well-Known Member
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
We've had a breakthrough. This i agree with. Can we hug it out now?
twinkletoes said:
We've had a breakthrough. This i agree with. Can we hug it out now?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City linked with Guus Hiddink
- Thread starter vans0531
- Start date
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
This.
twinkletoes said:El Boy Wonder said:You're just a condescending prick.
This.
twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
I disagree with you comparing what Wenger has done with what Mourinho could do.
Pam said:Challenger1978 said:What are we going to sacrifice ?.
The chance to emulate the exploits of Arsenal's "Invinceables". In other words, winning trophies with breathtaking football. Wenger is the best at it, or used to be, and has proved it to be possible, even in one of the most competitive leagues in world football. I'd still take Mourinhio, though, because the Whinger would never come to City and will eternally be associated with Arsenal.
I disagree with you comparing what Wenger has done with what Mourinho could do.
El Boy Wonder
Well-Known Member
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
KB :dance:
im going down like a hug in a burns unit in here, sense and facts are not welcome apparently
KB :dance:
im going down like a hug in a burns unit in here, sense and facts are not welcome apparently
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
I don't think there's a comparison. It's just that I don't think The Whinger is attainable and nobody else could pull it off. So I'd rather win playing less than breathtaking football than not win at all.
twinkletoes said:Pam said:The chance to emulate the exploits of Arsenal's "Invinceables". In other words, winning trophies with breathtaking football. Wenger is the best at it, or used to be, and has proved it to be possible, even in one of the most competitive leagues in world football. I'd still take Mourinhio, though, because the Whinger would never come to City and will eternally be associated with Arsenal.
I disagree with you comparing what Wenger has done with what Mourinho could do.
I don't think there's a comparison. It's just that I don't think The Whinger is attainable and nobody else could pull it off. So I'd rather win playing less than breathtaking football than not win at all.
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
Teach us then, oh wise one, for you are insightful and hard-hitting.
El Boy Wonder said:KB :dance:
im going down like a hug in a burns unit in here, sense and facts are not welcome apparently
Teach us then, oh wise one, for you are insightful and hard-hitting.
twinkletoes
Well-Known Member
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
Perhaps after three years of winning one nil every week you might change your mind?
Pam said:twinkletoes said:I disagree with you comparing what Wenger has done with what Mourinho could do.
I don't think there's a comparison. It's just that I don't think The Whinger is attainable and nobody else could pull it off. So I'd rather win playing less than breathtaking football than not win at all.
Perhaps after three years of winning one nil every week you might change your mind?
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
Haha. well just try making a point on here if we lose on Saturday! one step away from a suicide forum.
El Boy Wonder said:KB :dance:
im going down like a hug in a burns unit in here, sense and facts are not welcome apparently
Haha. well just try making a point on here if we lose on Saturday! one step away from a suicide forum.
Re: Would you really want Hiddink?
twinkletoes said:Pam said:I don't think there's a comparison. It's just that I don't think The Whinger is attainable and nobody else could pull it off. So I'd rather win playing less than breathtaking football than not win at all.
Perhaps after three years of winning one nil every week you might change your mind?