City or Liverpool to displace Utd as Prem League's top earning club

The biggest shock really is how close Tottenham are based on their trophy haul of recent seasons. I mean they've won nothing of note for 30 years and no championship for 60 years. The only reason is where they're based, and good management of course.
 
Next Year will see the PUMA deal kick in with our accounts, so that will hopefully add a few more Pounds to the Coffers. The Main thing to take from this is how far behind we are in Match Day revenue to the rest of the top 6.

I’m not sure match day revenue is the main thing to take from this (although it is a factor). Barca are streets ahead of the rest and the biggest factor in their growth is an expansion in merchandise. PSG have seen very big growth through better deals with global partners and an innovative approach to merchandising.
 
Some quotes from the report

"Liverpool are expected to retain seventh place in next year’s Money League, particularly if the club captures its first Premier League title and enjoys a run to the latter stages of the Champions League once again. Whilst it is unlikely that Liverpool will improve its placing next year due to new commercial deals signed by Manchester City, long-term ambitions of a top five Money League position in future editions are not unrealistic."


"With City signing a kit manufacturer deal with Puma, starting in 2019/20, reportedly delivering a significant uplift on their previous deal with Nike and recently announcing a new deal with a training kit partner, Marathonbet, we expect commercial revenue to increase in the next edition of the Money League. Were this to be twinned with an extended run into the latter stages of the Champions League, it is likely that City may return to the Money League top five once again, albeit potentially not at the expense of PSG, but its great Manchester rivals; something that some thought impossible a decade ago."

Liverpool have just signed a more lucrative kit deal (reportedly £70m p.a. compared to our £60m) but that might not kick in until the year after?
 
On the one hand, I take comfort that our match day revenue is lower than the rest of the Top 6 - means we are not fleecing our fans as much as the rest of them are. I think our corporate hospitality income is where we fall behind and could do better. Not sure of the demand though.
Be careful what you wish for - not sure the fan base would accept significant increases to ticket prices given the general outcry when season ticket prices rise by £30+ per year (for the modest increase in income, I think this is a faux pas by the club FWIW).

I totally agree, I don't think there is any more money that we can squeeze out of your average match going Fan. I just hope City keep to this, the little Increases each Year aren't even scratching the Surface.
 
With Liverpool increasing the Anfield capacity to 60,000 and the vast majority of their ticket sales being match day ticket sales and the expense of season tickets, Liverpool's match day revenues will keep on increasing.

There are a number of options to increase our match day revenues in the future. City will have looked at all options.

1. Keep the Etihad capacity as it is and continue increasing season ticket and match day ticket prices. :-(
1. Increase the capacity of the Etihad significantly, keep season tickets and match day tickets affordable so they continue selling, and drive further matchday revenue via match day sales, including food, drink, merchandise, and more competitively priced hospitality packages that would more corporate customers. That's where the real match day money is, apparently?
3. Looking at other areas of (non) match day revenue outside the Etihad stadium. For 10 years the Collar site and land around the stadium has stood empty most of the year, returning piece meal parking on match days and not much else, when other far more profitable revenues steams on match days and on non match days could and should have been created by now. 10 years! Temporary bars and restaurants, like Box Park and Hatch, large indoor marquees, seating 100's or 1000's of Citys fans, like they have at the Munich Beer Festival, where fans can have a drink and eat food before and after the match, staying dry and warm, with live music, etc. That would also attract people who just want to go there to drink, eat and to listen to some music. The containers and marquees wouldn't cost much to erect, place, maintain, and to remove. During the Summer Months the Collar site could host Beers festivals, Makers Markets, Food Markets, Music events, etc. These ideas and more would bring in additional revenue to the club. There is a huge and young city centre population 10 minutes away by tram and 20 minutes away by foot. And throughout late Spring and Summer they are going to events throughout the city centre spending their money. Yet 10 minutes away (by tram) there is a huge empty parcel of land next to the Etihad stadium doing and returning nothing. Why?
 
Last edited:
The lovable Liverpool Echo headline.

FSG and the £90m change that helped Liverpool catch Man City
Liverpool finally return to their position in the Deloitte Money League after 10 years
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.