bluechampion7891
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2014
- Messages
- 3,022
werent our revenues 347m?
bluechampion7891 said:werent our revenues 347m?
Victoria-bahs said:bluechampion7891 said:werent our revenues 347m?
MAY HAVE BEEN EURO?
In the emerates the rulers are all related.. hi uncle bob.. can we have a chat... sure
What if psg and city sponsors do a deal and sort it out themselves.inhouse...hmmmm sounds ok...
so etihad sponsor .psg 100 million or more... and psg s maine sponsor sponsor city 100 million or more.. oops Mr platini check mate
Not related parties..
bluechampion7891 said:werent our revenues 347m?
not having a go at liverpool but considering their fan base ,global exposure over the years etc ,their money people dont seem to be doing a very good job,considering 10 years ago i doubt we would of even made the top 50Marvin said:The Etihad deal was according to the Media worth £400 Million over 10 years. If you accept that, then that = £40m revenue a year.
That's a small amount of City's revenue per annum. You could take the Etihad deal out of the equation, and City would still be above Liverpool etc (and remember that if Etihad didn't sponsor us, someone else would be falling over themselves to sponsor the Champions.)