blueyorkie
Well-Known Member
I am amazed that some on here are slagging the club off , before its even opened. Surely give it a try before jumping to conclusions.
blueyorkie said:I am amazed that some on here are slagging the club off , before its even opened. Surely give it a try before jumping to conclusions.
lancs blue said:City have added another option for fans, where's the problem? People can still drink in town or Mary D's or one of the other local pubs if they want but now there's an alternative for other fans instead of going into the rather soulless concourses for a pie and a pint.
As for the prices, well if they were lower would the club really want thousands of fans all turning up in City Street trying to get served? I'm not sure tbh, maybe they just want manageable numbers hence the prices are less attractive. It'll be interesting to see how it turns out in practice.
Freestyler said:can't wait to see it before the game!
my mate is performing at the square opening tomorrow.
pbibs said:cleavers said:I read it perfectly well thanks, my argument is about all prices, not just beer, its just an example of being ripped off.
I've seen plenty of comments about the food prices, which are equally extortionate in my opinion. You can get a meal in Asda cafe for under £4 for instance. The cafe down towards the Mitchell does a good meal for about £3, the Chinese behind the Mitchell does excellent english, and chinese meals for similar prices, and you get pleasant friendly service there, because it really matters to these people that you come back.
So far I can only comment about the City "experience" in the stadium, and its piss poor, and outrageously priced, maybe this will be better quality and service I don't know, but it doesn't sound any better priced.
Thanks but no thanks City, I'll spend my hard earned money where I get the best value for money, so if as a club you want more of my money then the answer is simple improve quality and service and reduce price to compete sensibly.
You said that in my post I implied that I had a personal problem with Bladdered. I intentionally said in my post that I did not. Therefore, if, in fact you did read my post perfectly well, then you deliberately misrepresented me. |On the other hand, maybe u cannot see the wood from the trees. Must be all that cheap beer ur suppin.
scottyboi said:pbibs said:You said that in my post I implied that I had a personal problem with Bladdered. I intentionally said in my post that I did not. Therefore, if, in fact you did read my post perfectly well, then you deliberately misrepresented me. |On the other hand, maybe u cannot see the wood from the trees. Must be all that cheap beer ur suppin.
Thats the reply from someone who has lost the argument. End of. You completely avoided all the point's he made. SAD
scottyboi said:pbibs said:You said that in my post I implied that I had a personal problem with Bladdered. I intentionally said in my post that I did not. Therefore, if, in fact you did read my post perfectly well, then you deliberately misrepresented me. |On the other hand, maybe u cannot see the wood from the trees. Must be all that cheap beer ur suppin.
Thats the reply from someone who has lost the argument. End of. You completely avoided all the point's he made. SAD
pbibs said:You said that in my post I implied that I had a personal problem with Bladdered.
Just a cheap jibe, which failed to find its mark.pbibs said:Must be all that cheap beer ur suppin.