Didsbury Dave said:
Blue Mooner said:
And that's a position I 100% respect. It's when those who have a view seem desperate to be proven right at the cost to the success of the team, and they are persistent and almost tyrannical in their pursuit of 'proving' their superior knowledge
Lets face it we all get things wrong, Fergie gets things wrong from time to time.
I was one of those who kept saying Samaras would come good - I was spectacularly wrong (and proved my happy clapper credentials) - that said, I'd rather be wrong by trying to see the best in things than talk the club into a downward spiral.
Confidence plays a key role in every walk of life - those who predict doom and gloom for the economy - are accused of affecting confidence in UK plc and it can set you on a negative downward trend that is hard to reverse.
I do think it's 34 years of let downs that always makes City fans see the worse case scenarios rather than the best case. It really is time we talked 'up' our chances rather than talk them down.
I do find rags fans delusional. One said to me that Hernandes was the best signing of the summer and that was before he'd done anything BUT in another sense I admire their confidence and optimism.
If you want success then why talk our chances down ? Its counter inituitive to what you want so doesn't make sense. Well to me at least.
It's a forum.
Why not give your honest opinion about everything?
It won't make a scrap of difference to results on the pitch.
This is not Glasnost.
I accept you've got to be true to yourself, If you believe one thing you're not going to write something else. Although I try and stick to the mantra that if you've got nothing good to say don't say anything at all.
But, many things are how you want to view them. City have a big squad. Good or bad ? The press would have you believe it's bad because you can't keep players happy. I would have you believe it's good and an absolute necessity to be successful. (After all the rags have had a big squad for years)
Where I think you and I will never agree is that it won't affect results on the pitch. Maybe not your musings in isolation or even just this forum but the accumulated effect of negative after negative output across all media outlets will affect players on the pitch. Nothing surer.
Rooney is a great example, clearly with off field problems, resulting low confidence and poor performances.
Torres gets injured struggles and starts getting slated still not re-discovered his form.
If you hadn't seen either of them before you wouldn't go near them with a barge pole or believe that they were world class players.
Bale - low on confidence couldn't get a game at Spurs re-discovered his confidence and he looks awesome.
Constant negativity off the pitch will affect the players. There are so many examples where unrest off the pitch results in poor results. Portsmouth (pompey may have gone down anyway but certainly not by the amount they did) being a good example last year, Newcastle the year before that (now doing well with the same squad) and this year Liverpool. which is why I think City fans should think about the cumulative effect of their 'opinions' before they decide to spout off about 'alleged' goings on at the club.
I know this will have no effect on your view that the rumours, insinuations, inside leaks etc have no impact but I'm entitled to express my view as to why I believe yours and others postings do no favours for the hopes you have for the club.
Please feel free to convince me to the contrary, I'm all ears (metaphorically speaking)