City v Liverpool Post Match Thread

dctid said:
Whinging whining scousers - they lost not because of the ref but because their strikers missed some sitters

And some of the words used by Rogers are utterely cringeworthy words - brave is one that springs to mind - they are playing a football match not going over the top at the somme

Really really hope these whinging whining self pitying tossers domt make the top 4 - as bad as it sounds i think i would prefer the rags to finish 4 although in an ideal world Barcodes would be best just cant see it

This being the same ref that officiated in Liverpool's 1-0 win in the Carling Cup at The Ethiad, giving a Penalty!
Obviously showing some bias there!! And has given Liverpool a penalty on 2 other previous stints as referee .
 
Lot of waxing lyrical these last couple of days about Liverpool and how they are now a factor in the title race. I would agree with that as they will definitely play a big part in where the silverware goes, but what I would also say is that (IMO) its nice to be almost completely ignored in the afternmath of the game.

We are a juggernaut of a team that is going to be very difficult to stop now it has started to gather momentum and the press seem to have accepted that, choosing to focus on plucky Liverpool rather than ourselves.

It doesnt matter who played well, who deserved this, that or the other at this point, I have no doubt the manager sees it very much as 3 points in the bag and onwards to Palace, let the rest of the football world witter on about a game that happened 2 days ago.
 
My first comment on Rogers...

Shut your fucking mouth you big nosed bitter turd.
As mentioned your not fucking brave at all, it is a footy match not a fight to the death.

He knows his players were bad for cheating but rather than skirt the issue, has a moan about us and the ref.
Fuck off you tedious ****.
I hope it all goes to rat shit for him.

Your a grown man, buck up ffs.
 
TCIB said:
My first comment on Rogers...

Shut your fucking mouth you big nosed bitter turd.
As mentioned your not fucking brave at all, it is a footy match not a fight to the death.

He knows his players were bad for cheating but rather than skirt the issue, has a moan about us and the ref.
Fuck off you tedious ****.
I hope it all goes to rat shit for him.

Your a grown man, buck up ffs.

No, No No! We have all got it completely wrong!
I have just read in the Times newsapaper this morning that Brendan's press conference after the game was a masterstroke of football Management...
Yes really it was. He intentionally deflected all the focus off the defeat thus wrong footing the media and easing all of the
pressure of his team. Infact the Times said he is the protege of Jose and infact Jose would have been immensely proud. So much so he would have
allowed himself a wry grin being so pleased with his pupil.
So there you have it. Brendan wasn't being bitter or angry or allowing his emotions to get the best of him like a spoilt child - nope.
I really don't think there is any coinicidence whatsover that the sports editor of the Times is huge Liverpool supporting scouser - do you? No didn't think so.
And just to top it off in the Sunday Times tomorrow there is a special colour pull out special brochure called 'Kop Idols' - showcasing all the legendary Liverpool strikers down the years. I kid you not.
I wonder why I read the Telegraph more often than not these days?
 
TGR said:
TCIB said:
My first comment on Rogers...

Shut your fucking mouth you big nosed bitter turd.
As mentioned your not fucking brave at all, it is a footy match not a fight to the death.

He knows his players were bad for cheating but rather than skirt the issue, has a moan about us and the ref.
Fuck off you tedious ****.
I hope it all goes to rat shit for him.

Your a grown man, buck up ffs.

No, No No! We have all got it completely wrong!
I have just read in the Times newsapaper this morning that Brendan's press conference after the game was a masterstroke of football Management...
Yes really it was. He intentionally deflected all the focus off the defeat thus wrong footing the media and easing all of the
pressure of his team. Infact the Times said he is the protege of Jose and infact Jose would have been immensely proud. So much so he would have
allowed himself a wry grin being so pleased with his pupil.
So there you have it. Brendan wasn't being bitter or angry or allowing his emotions to get the best of him like a spoilt child - nope.
I really don't think there is any coinicidence whatsover that the sports editor of the Times is huge Liverpool supporting scouser - do you? No didn't think so.
And just to top it off in the Sunday Times tomorrow there is a special colour pull out special brochure called 'Kop Idols' - showcasing all the legendary Liverpool strikers down the years. I kid you not.
I wonder why I read the Telegraph more often than not these days?

You'd think maybe the Times would pull him up on such an obvious tactic by asking about things like Suarez' play acting and Skrtls shirt theft.

Obviously too much to ask of the press.
 
Did Rogers mention in his rant the 5 penalties we should have had for skirtel undressing Vinnie? No I didn't think so
 
If Rogers were an animal he'd be a budgie. You know, like elephant man would be a cockatoo, and Sir Giggs of Wiggs would be a cock, too, and Edward Fox would be a fox and Sam Alardyce would be a cod. Anyway, Rogers looks like a budgie.

OI! ROGERS! YOU LOOK LIKE A BUDGIE - BUDGIE FACE!
 
shackattack said:
whilst i can accept you have a great appetite and reputation for being noisy neighbours can you please stop upsetting ours ;-)


Quote from: Timbo's Goals on Today at 06:30:45 PM
Not sure if you're on here to gloat or not.

Possibly not.

Yet I'm fucking sure I know of no Red who'd go on the forum of an opposing rival club to discuss a game where the said rivals had been cheated out of a result.

As you can see my wounds are still raw following a game in which we played you on your own midden with 4 top players missing and outplayed you convincingly in open play, albeit leaving ourselves far too open to your counter attacking which had the tendency to make you look better than you actually were. That - and the fact a disgraceful display of unpalatable officialdom cost us an earnestly merited victory - is still pissing me off, despite my immense pride in our team. A team, incidentally, borne of natural organic growth paid for by a pedigree earned across six decades of competing at the very top of English and for the most part European victory. As distinct, that is, from a team borne on the back of a prostituted soul.

I know Hinesey and Steve Davies like the sort of thing you're doing. Personally speaking, however, it gets right on my fuckin tits. I do not wish to read a fuckin blog by some Man City nut, however literate and however much his written word postures fairness, attempting to convey hitherto unseen qualities he perceives within his beloved coven of fuckin mercenary twats masquerading as Manchester City footballers. Fuck them I say. Fuck the lot of them including the fuckin manager [Pellers - WTF!!]. In my eyes they are tainted and contaminated. Just like your fuckin club became the moment the depraved billions of that heinous multi billionaire transformed it into an entity that has nothing whatsoever to do with the game I have followed for 60 years.

If it were me - which it most patently isn't - then I'd banish you to the wilds of the Moss Side cyberspace simply for having the impertinence to come on here after snatching such a poxy win against us let alone citing one of your Blue Moon cronies in attempting to tell us how you fuckin achieved it without once referring to the truth of the matter.

;D
Brilliant spot mate. I sense he's a tad upset about something. Just a shame your boys managed to fuck up what should have been 3 easy points that would have taken you above them, dumped them out of the top 4 and really given him something to whinge about.
 
TGR said:
BringBackSwales said:
Did Rogers mention in his rant the 5 penalties we should have had for skirtel undressing Vinnie? No I didn't think so

I think he forgot about that bit!
How are you Tim?

At least Shearer mentioned that we should have had three pens on MOTD.

Brendan R is just a tosser. As even Jason Cundy said on Talkshite, once the Scousers started claiming the ref was bias they had lost the argument.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.