We need to bear a few things in mind here:
First of all let's remember that one of the reasons we were selected as club suitable for the large scale investment we have had was because of all round good nature and loyalty as supporters during 3 decades of winning nothing. Its not our natural way to be 'toys out of the pram' merchants like at some other clubs and I'm sure this helped our cause. Presently MCFC get no credit whatsoever for breaking up the tedious monoploy that existed before, with you know who making up the top four and its totally to the Sheik's credit that we now have a Premier league with only Arsenal from that monopoly still in the top four (and hopefully due to win nothing so that their toys get thrown out of the pram along with Wenger.) Do I want to see us hack off the Sheik and the City management over this issue - sorry I don't: I think people should pick and choose their games and vote with their feet regarding whether to attend or not and I don't want to see us going down the Liverpool fan's route of shooting ourselves in the foot in the process. I do not want to go back to the wilderness years again and had actually reached my limit by the Stewart Pearce era where we were very likely doomed to do an Aston Villa / Newcastle forever more.
The only issue here for me is whether the people signed up to the CL cup scheme had an expectation that they would need to pay this much to attend the game: everyone else can pick and choose, and let the club work out the pricing model based on attendances - its the smart thing to do. I'm one of the lucky ones who got a £299 season ticket in the South Stand and I still can't believe my luck so I actually agree with the club's overall pricing structure to have a large capacity ground with ticket prices that suit every level of attendance and premium games and tickets when and where it matters: if this means tourists paying top dollar for my old seat on the half way line then to be honest: fair enough.
The scousers did an incredible job of getting the £30 away ticket adopted and they deserve the credit for that - however, they don't realise that in today's climate they are limiting LFC's ability to compete because sadly, money talks and as we know the players are incredibly greedy: the moneyball philosphy that the USA based owners of LFC subscribe to requires them to 'monetize' everything to 'secure' the 'optimal' player and we are lucky (more than we could ever know) that Brendan blew it on the home straight. With LFC's capacity and prices capped for the foreseeable future their moneyball philosophy could be totally broken.
So, to blame the club for being greedy when in fact they are just being pragmatic about their business, and to avoid pointing the blame where it truly lies i.e. at the players is I believe being totally disingenuous.
I am disappointed that I am not yet rich enough to own a football club, but wise enough to know I wouldn't want to even if I was (do you agree Mike Ashley?) - I know that deep down the outrageous cost of watching football is 100% down to the greed of the players and the greed and stupidity of those people running the game. This needs to be said first, before anything else is said.
Am I glad that City broke the mould thanks to the Sheik's money? Yes I am.
Am I prepared to pay the odd consequence for doing so? Yes I am.
Am I settled that this means that I now pick and choose my games whilst seeing loads of tourists watching those games in my stead? Yes I am.
Should the club do more to sort out ticket prices across the board for families etc? Yes and I trust them to work this out.
Is this the wrong battle for us to fight at this time? Champions League Quarter Final for the first time in our history in support of the Sheik's vision for success? Yes, its totally wrong IMHO.
Sorry to tell it as it is. {Note: Full respect due to the people on Champions League Cup Scheme of course - I totally get that issue.}