RichardDunneOwnGoal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2015
- Messages
- 2,016
100% correct. Thank you for being so thorough and realistic in your post.
In your opinion, I wholly disagree with his post and the sentiment expressed therein.
100% correct. Thank you for being so thorough and realistic in your post.
Let me answer some of your points.We need to bear a few things in mind here:
I think our loyalty through the bad times certainly played a decent part in the Sheikh's decision and we're certainly tolerant as a fan group. But some things cause us to fight and Swales' mismanagement saw a long and bitter campaign to out him. So we have our limits and this seems to be one.First of all let's remember that one of the reasons we were selected as club suitable for the large scale investment we have had was because of all round good nature and loyalty as supporters during 3 decades of winning nothing. Its not our natural way to be 'toys out of the pram' merchants like at some other clubs and I'm sure this helped our cause.
There really is no connection between us taking a stand on ticket prices and us going back to League 1. People certainly should be free to choose whether to go to games or not. I'm often working out of town midweek so can't do those games when I am. But jsut slinking way because you've been prices out isn't the answer because unless people make a stand, they'll keep putting the prices up and up and one day it'll be the turn of those who think the prices today are reasonable.I think people should pick and choose their games and vote with their feet regarding whether to attend or not and I don't want to see us going down the Liverpool fan's route of shooting ourselves in the foot in the process. I do not want to go back to the wilderness years again and had actually reached my limit by the Stewart Pearce era where we were very likely doomed to do an Aston Villa / Newcastle forever more.
It is the smart thing to do but the attendances at CL games have never been as high as the league attendances for various reasons. People who live a long way away or work away from Manchester. People whose work means they can't make the game because of their shifts. Kids who are at school. People who can't or don't want to pay the extra. People who have travel issues with night games. Etc. So the smart thing would be to recognise that, decide that the core support won't fill the ground and price the match to attract regulars put off by the price or new spectators who are just interested in this one game. They'l be selling cheap tickets to students, social clubs, other groups and maybe even giving them away to senior schools. So why not to regular fans who already fork out a lot of money?The only issue here for me is whether the people signed up to the CL cup scheme had an expectation that they would need to pay this much to attend the game: everyone else can pick and choose, and let the club work out the pricing model based on attendances - its the smart thing to do.
I said the same about the range of options for watching PL games at the Points of Blue meeting last night. It's good that we try to cater to every wallet. But then why charge just over £15 for the chance to see United or Chelsea and £50 (which I think you'll pay in SS3) to see PSG in the CL? What's the difference?I'm one of the lucky ones who got a £299 season ticket in the South Stand and I still can't believe my luck so I actually agree with the club's overall pricing structure to have a large capacity ground with ticket prices that suit every level of attendance and premium games and tickets when and where it matters: if this means tourists paying top dollar for my old seat on the half way line then to be honest: fair enough.
Knocking £20 off the price of PSG tickets does not in any way impact our ability to compete, certainly not when we're making something like £12m by playing these two legs. So let's knock that on the head completely.The scousers did an incredible job of getting the £30 away ticket adopted and they deserve the credit for that - however, they don't realise that in today's climate they are limiting LFC's ability to compete because sadly, money talks and as we know the players are incredibly greedy: the moneyball philosphy that the USA based owners of LFC subscribe to requires them to 'monetize' everything to 'secure' the 'optimal' player and we are lucky (more than we could ever know) that Brendan blew it on the home straight. With LFC's capacity and prices capped for the foreseeable future their moneyball philosophy could be totally broken.
But they are being greedy. They've sat down and set a price they MUST know will result in quite a few empty seats (and there will be loads if we get done in Paris) because they think that will maximise their revenue. They could have decided to set a price that ensured the stadium would be full and that would cost them around 1% of the money they'll be making for just those two games (let alone all the rest of the money they've made from this CL run.So, to blame the club for being greedy when in fact they are just being pragmatic about their business, and to avoid pointing the blame where it truly lies i.e. at the players is I believe being totally disingenuous.
Bollocks. You were outright trolling, and turned a constructive and interesting thread full of discussion into a display of squabbling and outright degeneracy. And for you to say that the said mod was "belittling our club" is complete and utter nonsense, just a deliberate misrepresentation of what he was saying and his position in an attempt to undermine him and his points.
If anything, you were belittling the club's support, while performing some grim self aggrandisement.
Your only real effort was to troll and get people's backs up, ruining discussion. And you succeeded.
It was for the better of the thread that you were banned from posting in it, regardless of your position on a protest. I look forward to you being banned from this one too once you inevitably cross the line again.
In your opinion, I wholly disagree with his post and the sentiment expressed therein.
I don't usually reply to posts like this but I will to this.Be careful speaking any common sense on here means you get banned from posting on these threads. I know a mod on here banned myself and another 2 members from posting on the other thread because we did not agree with his views. We put well mannered and constructive replys but he has decided to remove our ability to post on that thread.
That is more worrying than the ticket prices that we have a Mod on here who is stopping people making comments if they don't agree with him. We have a problem with the club ticket prices and definitely a Mod on here who has a sole purpose to belittle our club.
Be careful speaking any common sense on here means you get banned from posting on these threads. I know a mod on here banned myself and another 2 members from posting on the other thread because we did not agree with his views. We put well mannered and constructive replys but he has decided to remove our ability to post on that thread.
That is more worrying than the ticket prices that we have a Mod on here who is stopping people making comments if they don't agree with him. We have a problem with the club ticket prices and definitely a Mod on here who has a sole purpose to belittle our club.
Not to worry won't be back just because I am one of many that can afford to go doesn't make us the enemy. To restrict people's point of view because they don't agree with others isnt what forums are about. You view it as trolling because it doesn't fall inline with you and your mates. Most people that can afford to go feel trolled for trying to argue their side. Clearly Bluemoon has changed to a place where people want to moan all day about getting kicked out for smoking and not being able to afford tickets.
Anyway I am off waited to long for your reply when you lied about capping on away ticket prices to try and fight your argument.
Let me answer some of your points.
I think our loyalty through the bad times certainly played a decent part in the Sheikh's decision and we're certainly tolerant as a fan group. But some things cause us to fight and Swales' mismanagement saw a long and bitter campaign to out him. So we have our limits and this seems to be one.
There really is no connection between us taking a stand on ticket prices and us going back to League 1. People certainly should be free to choose whether to go to games or not. I'm often working out of town midweek so can't do those games when I am. But jsut slinking way because you've been prices out isn't the answer because unless people make a stand, they'll keep putting the prices up and up and one day it'll be the turn of those who think the prices today are reasonable.
It is the smart thing to do but the attendances at CL games have never been as high as the league attendances for various reasons. People who live a long way away or work away from Manchester. People whose work means they can't make the game because of their shifts. Kids who are at school. People who can't or don't want to pay the extra. People who have travel issues with night games. Etc. So the smart thing would be to recognise that, decide that the core support won't fill the ground and price the match to attract regulars put off by the price or new spectators who are just interested in this one game. They'l be selling cheap tickets to students, social clubs, other groups and maybe even giving them away to senior schools. So why not to regular fans who already fork out a lot of money?
I said the same about the range of options for watching PL games at the Points of Blue meeting last night. It's good that we try to cater to every wallet. But then why charge just over £15 for the chance to see United or Chelsea and £50 (which I think you'll pay in SS3) to see PSG in the CL? What's the difference?
Knocking £20 off the price of PSG tickets does not in any way impact our ability to compete, certainly not when we're making something like £12m by playing these two legs. So let's knock that on the head completely.
But they are being greedy. They've sat down and set a price they MUST know will result in quite a few empty seats (and there will be loads if we get done in Paris) because they think that will maximise their revenue. They could have decided to set a price that ensured the stadium would be full and that would cost them around 1% of the money they'll be making for just those two games (let alone all the rest of the money they've made from this CL run.