Possibly, FFP relaxation rules seem all a bit vague, but I got the impression the Sane income was allocated to bringing the £120 mill loss down to £60 mill over 2 years rather than towards transfers. As you say it’s all one pot really so may not matter. Out of my depth really.I could be wrong but I don’t think it matters whether the Sane money came in last year, this year or next year because, my understanding is that, they’ve aggregated FFP over 3 years due to covid.
Any FFP experts please chime in and confirm / add detail. Thanks.
Think your argument fell apart when you suggested that London is a good thing!Big shout that - Spurs have a better stadium than us, get 60,000 every week, a better training ground and are in London. Arrogant to dismiss them.
They arent though. Any player, or in fact any object at all, are worth what someone will pay for them. Who can you see paying us prices like that for anyone?That’s awful. We’d be making a loss on 2 and that would be way below market value for all 3. Laporte and Bernardo are worth £70mil each, minimum.
I think he was sold in July which is after our accounting year end, so the money will be in this years accountsNo it doesn’t.
July last year, so in the accounts that finished June this year.So last years accounts. This summers transfers will be in this years accounts, ending June 22.I think he was sold in July which is after our accounting year end, so the money will be in this years accounts