Blue Feather
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 May 2013
- Messages
- 1,523
We had a say on the badge, why can't we with the kits?
probably because we'd have exactly the same kit every season.We had a say on the badge, why can't we with the kits?
Puma is not Etihad. They could choose for a white logo. And I hope they do. It fits sky blue much more.It won't be white Etihad don't like it. I quite like it in purple and the purple on the socks and shorts , and I'm even ok with a bit of purple on the shoulder. Traditionalists can wait for the anniversary shirt if they don't like it.
Not for the Etihad part they can't, the puma could be.Puma is not Etihad. They could choose for a white logo. And I hope they do. It fits sky blue much more.
probably because we'd have exactly the same kit every season.
That's what I'm saying. Puma can and should choose for white. And they actually already did this on clubs they sponsor with a similar sky blue colour as their main kit.Not for the Etihad part they can't, the puma could be.
But the puma part is tiny and would look wrong if it's a different colour to the Etihad.That's what I'm saying. Puma can and should choose for white. And the actually already did it on clubs with a similar sky blue colour as their main kit.
I still call shenanigans on any badge consultation tbfWe had a say on the badge, why can't we with the kits?
That's just a mental part on getting used to. It doesn't look wrong in my eyes. The wrong part is Etihad being blind on that dull navy color while using a white logo would've stand out more than it does now.But the puma part is tiny and would look wrong if it's a different colour to the Etihad.
I know, but Etihad have the final say and if they say white doesn't stand out enough that's that.That's just a mental part on getting used to. It doesn't look wrong in my eyes. The wrong part is Etihad being blind on that ugly navy color while using a white logo would've stand out more than it does now.
Or
A easy choose.