warpig
Well-Known Member
they do as that has been added very recently lol.
They do read BM ;-)
whilst we are on a roll......
Dear City,
Can we please have white shorts navy socks next season.
Kindest Regards
WP.
they do as that has been added very recently lol.
They do read BM ;-)
I might be stupid (i know i am in fact), but why are we thinking there wont be 'FC' or Football Club' in the new badge??
from a bloke called Timps "MCFCjustsayin" on FB, can't find a quote thing to put it in a box...
***NEW BADGE UPDATE***
Seeing as City have released a little more info on the new badge, it means I can too....
I can confirm that all the elements of the badge have now been released to the general public.
There is a ship, 3 rivers, 1894 and a red rose on the badge.
I can confirm that there is also a shield within the inner circle and there is no 'Est.' before the 1894. There's also no 'MCFC' written on it, in fact there's no 'FC' or 'Football Club' on it either.
whilst we are on a roll......
Dear City,
Can we please have white shorts navy socks next season.
Kindest Regards
WP.
To be honest mate, I don't really think the "Cityzens" thing has worked. 10 years ago the vote would have been season ticket holders only, because there was no such thing as "Cityzens".
Since Ferran came on board, he's tried to replicate everything about Barca to City. Some of it, like the CFA has been great. But the "Cityzens" idea is trying to replicate the Socios model in Barca. They are the people who actually own the club and decide on the President, and essentially pick who runs the club. "Cityzens" get to vote on whether a rose appears on the new badge, but have no say on a final design. That's down to the genius' who signed off the Melbourne and Cityzens logo's.
I'll add my name to that. White shorts every single time without any exceptions.
If you could throw in navy socks every so often that would be a huge plus too.
Thanks,
ST
How can you have an opinion on something you've never seen?