your a clever fucker,i tried to do the new city badges but ended up covered in felt tip.No I rendered them up myself, to much time on my hands :)
Did it on 3d studio and photoshopyour a clever fucker,i tried to do the new city badges but ended up covered in felt tip.
what tinterweb site would you visit to try and do that black magic
did you get it for Christmas :) thanks for that, but ill only end up throwing my laptop in frustration if I tried :)Did it on 3d studio and photoshop
That's absolutely untrue (I'm sure there's some sarcasm in there). Personally, I wouldn't blame City if they never consulted with fans again after this. According to some when the consultation opened the club had designed a NYCFC copycat badge months ago that was going to be foisted on us after the fake consultation closed. There were all sorts of conspiracy theories on this thread never mind the others on other forums. Ultimately, City asked fans about the elements that mattered to them. They made it clear they wouldn't be bringing back an old badge but they would design one based on feedback. They've done that and produced stats. They deserve praise for what they've done - though to be frank all clubs should follow City's lead and it should be normal business practice. If FCUM had consulted with fans in this way it'd be held up as the model, and yet here is a leading European club doing it.
There are elements on the badge I personally did not vote for, but I do respect the popularity of these elements and so I totally support the new badge and, more importantly, the process.
Someone else already has as stated earlier on page 162 link is that incorrect? No one has been able to clarify so far.
You're surprised that there is some scepticism that the survey was entirely genuine, and merely served box ticking exercise, and you wouldn't blame City if they never consulted us on anything again?
Nice one mate.
Hard not to interpret some of your posts as shilling to be honest.
Seeking the feedback of the supporters is the least we should expect for a change of this magnitude, I don't think it's this grand gesture that should be lauded. Also, I think the scepticism of many blues is more reflective of the lack of trust we have for the club suits from a perspective of doing right by the supporters/club heritage (not financially etc).
When you look at QPR and Everton giving their fans a clear and transparent vote on the new design of their badge, letting them actually pick from a few different designs, then yeah, our very most basic 'consultation' to trademarked official badge in a matter of weeks does seem like a box ticketing exercise.
I'm sure our input didn't count for entirely nothing, but I doubt it mattered all that much.
You're surprised that there is some scepticism that the survey was entirely genuine, and merely served box ticking exercise, and you wouldn't blame City if they never consulted us on anything again?
Nice one mate.
Hard not to interpret some of your posts as shilling to be honest.
Seeking the feedback of the supporters is the least we should expect for a change of this magnitude, I don't think it's this grand gesture that should be lauded. Also, I think the scepticism of many blues is more reflective of the lack of trust we have for the club suits from a perspective of doing right by the supporters/club heritage (not financially etc).
When you look at QPR and Everton giving their fans a clear and transparent vote on the new design of their badge, letting them actually pick from a few different designs, then yeah, our very most basic 'consultation' to trademarked official badge in a matter of weeks does seem like a box ticketing exercise.
I'm sure our input didn't count for entirely nothing, but I doubt it mattered all that much.
In Soviet Union, badge wear you.Have you seen the QPR badge options, they're virtually the same.
http://www.qpr.co.uk/news/article/qpr-club-crest-fans-vote-2852214.aspx
Beautiful.No I rendered them up myself, to much time on my hands :)