A
A
Anonymous
Guest
BobKowalski said:How the affair was handled has nothing to do with how they or anyone else felt about Mancini. I expect Ferran and Txiki to handle the transistion to a new manager as smoothly as possible and not have it plastered over every media outlet 24 hours before an important Cup Final. They have a duty of care in how they conduct business and that duty of care extends to the owners, employees of the club and us as fans.
So don't let your 'fan boy' emotion blind you to mistakes made by Txiki and Ferran. And besides you know I supported the appointment of the Barca boys and still do. It was the right move and I never rated the chances of them getting on with Mancini that highly either but what happened on Saturday still pisses me off and will do for a while. It should and could have been avoided.
Their duty of care is to the long term health of City, nothing more. As I've said, last Friday you along with a few others were commenting on how amazing it was that there was zero speculation about Mancini's position in the British media. Four days later he's sacked and we'd handled it badly? Nah ... Ancelotti knowing he was dead man walking since February, with the British press writing it every week, and then him getting the sack in the tunnel within an hour of the last game. That's handling it badly. A week ago the media in the UK were still reporting that Mancini was safe. Ferran and Txiki did the best they could whilst dealing with someone who is basically unmanageable.
Anyway, it's all moot. The bunting is out. Just as the handling of the Hughes sacking was water under the bridge within a couple of weeks, the Mancini sacking will be the same.