Dribble
Well-Known Member
And in the process, we flog our players to death? This is worth £100m to Manchester City Football Club?The £100m is just for starters. All the extra eyes on us worldwide = more revenue.
Us winning would also boost future sponsorship deals allowing us to justify us exceeding accepted market value. Essentially we could agree deals that others wouldnt be able to.
Also it would cement our place as currently the most viewed team by US audience.
And we win a trophy that is likely to be highly coveted going forward.
All the above would place us at a significant advantage to red cartel who aren’t invited.
If the trade off is a slow start to the following season, well that’s usually factored in whenever there’s a summer tournament.
Pros outweigh the cons for me.
As Rodri & KDB said, the players haven't asked for this, hence why there's muted talk of a player strike.
If City weren't involved, I wouldn't be watching. The first World Club Cup I've ever watched was the one we were involved in. For me this is a bullshit competition with more downsides than ups for City.
FIFA can keep their £100m. I'd rather our players have a proper rest, proper pre-season & a proper start to the season. £100m & a few more eyeballs on City isn't worth the stress on our players welfare imo.
Last edited: