Worsleyweb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2022
- Messages
- 1,383
- Team supported
- City
Not too fussed about this one genuinely. I dont think he is quite top drawer. Time will tell though. Amazing fee for him. City clearly thinking on the same lines.
i mean everyone knows city suck at selling
To be fair to him i think he’s just got a languid style. Reminds me of a much less talented Chris Waddle. Not too fussed about him going.He never looked interested, he always looked as if he couldn't be arsed
Clearly not.Also, this isn't really a straight forward topic, is it?
Thanks for that…Ben Watson.
Putting the finance stuff aside I don’t think we’ve gotten that balance terribly wrong with Palmer. He’s been in and around the first team for three-ish seasons now and has gotten enough minutes for us, and certainly the staff who sees him more than we do, to get a decent sense who he is. Whether or not that assessment is correct this isn’t like a Lavia situation where he didn‘t even get a shot.Again, the points you're responding to are more about the wider issue of the integration of academy players into the first team, not strictly about the transfer of Cole Palmer to Chelsea.
I didn't rate Palmer as much as many other clearly do. I still think he'll be a quality player but I feel like his two goals a couple of weeks ago changed the perception of him for a lot of people.
But, again, I think there's a balanced to be reached in terms of using our academy players. Many on here don't seem to think that way because whenever we sell them they explicitly state that they're happy to have extra money in the club instead.
Quality's in the eye of the beholder, but I'd seriously beg to differ on this comparision.That is the reason you warmed to Rico and not to Cole although he is twice the baller.