mrtwiceaseason
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 7,679
Couldn't give a shit if he's a rag or not was just stating he's not a lifelong blue .Insecurity. Our fan base reeks of it.
Couldn't give a shit if he's a rag or not was just stating he's not a lifelong blue .Insecurity. Our fan base reeks of it.
Nothing to be or feel insecure regarding the rags these days,nothing at all,the hate will go on forever from fans of a certain age and upwards,but insecurity ? Nah,no chance.
And yet half of you talk about them more than you do your own club. Maybe it's more of a compulsion to act up to the top blue caricature at every opportunity.
Journalists who put in good work are shot down because they grew up supporting united, academy players are rounded on because of the same thing, everything gets compared to them, their thread for this season is rapidly approaching 1000 pages and anyone who doesn't go along with the groupthink on here gets labelled a rag straight away (btw, preemptive LOL to the first person who responds with it). The list of petty and embarrassing bullshit goes on and on.
Regardless, I was wrong. The fan base doesn't reek of insecurity. It's just a huge number of the users on this site. Never have I met a City fan in real life so fucking obsessed with them.
Who gives a fuck if Palmer is or was a united fan? I dread to think what will happen if a photo of Phil in a red shirt ever surfaces.
It's just so fucking mind numbing to wade through it all the time. Even this bullshit need to act like we're in control of everything and how anyone who wants to leave us is a ****. Cole's a rag, Bernardo's wife is a gold digging woman, Sane's a self obsessed mummy's boy, Sterling's a twat and was always shit etc etc etc etc.
Cole wanted to leave us. We weren't shopping him around. Deal with it.
Anyway, I'm off. Nobody wants to read this bullshit and I can't be arsed writing it anymore.
Bit young to be lesbians?Does that really matter? I couldn't give a toss who our players supported when they were kids, as long as they do the business on the pitch for us. As an example, I give you....
View attachment 92146
To be fair hes seen players come to city and get more minutes than foden despite being no where near fodens level.
Part of that is because hes academy im convinced (subconsciously). If we bought foden for £75-100m he’d play every week.
So palmer who is good but not as good has the choice of:
1) eventually making it at city but lets be honest it will be 3-4 years before he could be a regular and earn like hes a regular
2) take a career risk of moving but go where someone wants you, will pay you way more and could fast track that development
Even if hes a bit part player this year for chelsea, he’s got a better chance of becoming a regular starter for them than us
You’re comparing what Kane has done on the pitch for Spurs to what Palmer has done for City? Interesting..Does that really matter? I couldn't give a toss who our players supported when they were kids, as long as they do the business on the pitch for us. As an example, I give you....
View attachment 92146
Part of that is because hes academy im convinced (subconsciously). If we bought foden for £75-100m he’d play every week.In what way does he have a better chance of becoming a regular for Chelsea than for us?