Cole Palmer

[WRicko]

That’s not a sustainable model for them when they know had Colwill been signed instead he is worth 60m+ in this market.

It’s great they got Europe, but we will have to disagree on this point, I’m sure they won’t make this mistake again.

Maybe I will be proven wrong in a few days and we here about a loan with no buy option but I highly doubt it.

Brighton model is based on buying young talent and selling so loans are not great for them because they have it reduces the numbers they can buy and sell

Having said that a loan is basically a free player they might even get him on the cheap afterwards they play might be desperate to go there afterwards rather than somewhere else if not good enough for us. Of course they might have made the player more valuable by making him better but they have also reduced the risks involved and they can always just go for another player after the loan if he is not expansive because he has been a success so it’s not cost them anything so it not as you suggest

 

[Summerbuzz]

Well.....

 

[RayCTID]

Tricky one but we shouldn't cash in on him just yet.

 

[NQCitizen]

A player we should obviously keep and give Mahrez's role.

 

[Sir peace frog]

lovely goal, not sure about motm though haha

 

[clarion]

I told you.

 

[BAZCHESTER CITY_85]

juanmar lillo effect already ?

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

Tricky one but we shouldn't cash in on him just yet.

We shouldn’t be cashing in on him at all. The talent is obvious

 

[Kippax77]

Class

 

[Manchester_lalala]

I think Pep playing him on the left last season hasn’t done Palmer any favours in the eyes of City fans. The lads a right winger, pretty much a Mahrez regen. I do think he’ll benefit from going out on loan, but he’s a talented player.