Ohrodneyrodney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2007
- Messages
- 2,383
And the credible sources of information are..........................Some sources of information are credible, others, such as yourself, are not.
And the credible sources of information are..........................Some sources of information are credible, others, such as yourself, are not.
I'm not going to waste my time.And the credible sources of information are..........................
That's because you cant name any, fair enough. Which is exactly my point.I'm not going to waste my time.
And the credible sources of information are..........................
OK I'll bite..That's because you cant name any, fair enough. Which is exactly my point.
And the credible sources of information are..........................
Oh, the unqualified bloke every time. The crash is just such fun.OK I'll bite..
The credible sources are experts, through their experience, knowledge and qualifications.
If you were designing a huge bridge, would you trust an experienced, qualified engineer with extensive knowledge about bridges, or an unqualified bloke who thinks he knows how to do it ?
You guessed incorrectly. That’s like saying the opposite of supporting Manchester City is supporting Sky Sports. Those two things aren’t the opposite of each other… they aren’t even in the same genre of entities, as one is a football club and the other is a media corporation.I guess the opposite of believing conspiracy theories is believing the mainstream media. I'll keep an open mind thanks.
Regarding what topic?And the credible sources of information are..........................
I’d trust the YouTube bridge building expert Bill ; )OK I'll bite..
The credible sources are experts, through their experience, knowledge and qualifications.
If you were designing a huge bridge, would you trust an experienced, qualified engineer with extensive knowledge about bridges, or an unqualified bloke who thinks he knows how to do it ?
True but with a Caveat, I believe 8 million people or so or on the National Health waiting list, that must touch the majority of the population, if it is your sibling, parent or grandparent. So is mainstream media full of experts both political and medical on how we can improve this. Or is it Prince Harry, Kim Kardashian and what Russell Brand did ten years ago?Ok I'd say the opposite of believing conspiracy theories is not believing in them.
Like when the worlds experts come on TV and give explanations about covid, you either believe them or not. They are not the media. They are highly qualified extremally clever experts.
I’d employ Cher, Christie Hynde and Neneh Cherry.I’d trust the YouTube bridge building expert Bill ; )
Well at least that's an answer thank you. But the problem is they are the highly qualified experts put on TV....by the media. Like pinkfinal said. I just find myself sceptical of everything these days because everyone seems to have an agenda. I would just like news reports to be facts, so I can make my own mind up from there
The Oxford University bit would/could suggest they had some credibility.Well really not into politics as feel all governments are self interested and make little difference. But I will tell you a story which you can believe or otherwise. A few years back was on a skiing vacation staying in a chalet where we all met up for dinner. Sitting opposite a few people who I noted would not eat meat. So asked why they made that decision. Well these guys were doing research into prions at Oxford University. They mentioned that there was a problem with beef in the UK that it was well known,accepted, and the government was doing nothing about it. 2 years later the BSE crisis hits. Am also sure there were people who would have questioned Blair and his WMD and been shot down at the time. Sometimes, just sometimes, the minority get it right. Not many admittedly.
It certainly isn't the best place to learn grammar or spelling in my experience of these people.The Oxford University bit would/could suggest they had some credibility.
It has better expert reviews than the university of life.
Sadly, the university of live has better peer reviews than any other university. Everyone who attends it thinks it’s the best way to learn.
The troof is out their.It certainly isn't the best place to learn grammar or spelling in my experience of these people.
Spellchecker is a tool of the government. Quite often when you’re making critical pints you’ll find keen worms changed to altar the meanness.The troof is out their.
Or how to switch on the spell-checker.It certainly isn't the best place to learn grammar or spelling in my experience of these people.
They have it on I reckon, but their spelling is so poor that the spellchecker can't select the right word.Or how to switch on the spell-checker.