ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,209
If he dies within 28 days of his first Covid test he will definitely be recorded in that figure. That is not the final figure given by the ONS which records death certificate data. What is recorded there will depend on what the doctors attending thought what happened and how important the contributing factors were.A family friend died last week in hospital of lung cancer. But whilst in there he tested positive for COVID. Now will be listed as a COVID stat?
What about the report that said lockdown measures are killing 2 people for every 3 that die of Covid?Yes as I understand it.
"Died of any cause within 28 days of a positive test" is the standard reported statistic.
Of course, there will be people like your family friend who sadly die of other causes and make an overcount.
Equally, there will be some people who are never tested and die, or die beyond 28 days, and cause an undercount.
Overall, the "within 28 days" seems to be a reasonable compromise whilst giving a simple and consistent statistic.
Overall excess deaths and deaths where COVID is mentioned on the death certificate are two other measures which are broadly consistent.
If that is something which happens I guess the government would have to take that into account and would announce how something like a vaccine passport would work. That said anyone thinking of booking a holiday abroad at the moment needs to give their heads a wobble
What about the report that said lockdown measures are killing 2 people for every 3 that die of Covid?
Excess deaths cannot be used to count Covid imo, there’s loads of cases of the above and people not receiving vital care for other reasons and lockdown debilitating health generally.
I am not for a minute posting an anti lockdown message here, it’s the best of a bad situation with cases and deaths so high, I just don’t think excess deaths should be the measure.
Yeah, I don't think there is a single measure. They all tell you slightly different things, but are pretty consistent AFAICT.
I'm not familiar with the report you mention and I'm pretty certain there evidence is that lockdown isn't killing many people at all, maybe even reducing deaths other than COVID net. It's just shit, rather than net lethal (yet - longer term might be another matter). Anyway, if you know what the report is, drop a link in.
Source: ONSLockdown 'killed two people for every three who died of coronavirus' at peak of outbreak
Estimates show 16,000 people died through missed medical care by May 1, while virus killed 25,000 in same period
As far as I understand, and please correct me if I am wrong. A death certificate will record the cause of death whether it is Covid, Cancer or trauma from a bus accident at the time of death. The NHS stats relate to any death within 28 days of diagnosis of Covid . I assume Covid is now a notifiable disease and statisticians correlate the number of people who have been notified as having Covid,and then look at death certificates for those dying within 28 days of receiving that notification. If you believe the two to be identical so be it. I just suggested the two may not be the same.Personally I would prefer to look at the numbers of deaths actually certified as Covid, because if you get better and still die of it four weeks,six weeks later, it is still Covid on the death certificate. If you die of something else, it is recorded as such, like bus trauma.How many people do you think are included in the death figures because they were knocked over by a bus a week after testing positive for Covid? Do you think it is more or less than the number of people who are excluded from the death figures because their test was more than a month before they lost their life?
I think the experts have said that excess deaths is the best indicator of Covid mortality so I understand we’ve done terribly on that score too, despite the heroic efforts of the NHS.