B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.How?
I have heard that from a number of people.
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.How?
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.
I have heard that from a number of people.
I’d heard people in Wuhan had covid like symptoms around Sept 2019 but hadn’t heard about Barcelona pre Sept…will look into it.Im not ruling out that it had come from a lab, until its ruled out its always still an option. As I mentioned above though there are positive samples from Spain that pre date Sept 19.
Those dates also coincide with the US Pandemic alert team leaving the Wuhan lab after Trump killed the funding.
It's my opinion that they are under instruction to put coivd on as cause of death even though when it is not the case.
I have heard that from a number of people.
I’d heard people in Wuhan had covid like symptoms around Sept 2019 but hadn’t heard about Barcelona pre Sept…will look into it.
It's obvious - isn't it?How?
All you are doing is what we see happening in Australasia now. As soon as you open up you are back to square one. There should be a full cost benefit analysis done in respect of lockdown and the evidence should be in by now. What you continually see, almost everwhere you look, is that the shape of the 'wave' is almost identical, whatever measures have been implimented or not. Vaccines preventing severe illness and death are the only way out of this not lockdown or other NPI's that merely move the wave further along but also increase other Public Health issues.What kind of an answer is that? Social distancing has repeatedly been shown to reduce transmission. Of course it is not a long term answer but we don't have any alternative. Hospital numbers are up 500 in a week in advance of schools and colleges opening.
What we need are new vaccines or a 3rd dose. The WHO may well have a point that from a global perspective they should go to other nations but I can't see that happening.
Why?
We infected a significant slice of the population before vaccines and 150,000 died as a result.
Worst case for Aus/NZ is that the same slice of the population is infected, but after vaccination, so far less will die.
How is this a deep hole?
Excess deaths are the key to this now not deaths within 28 days.Aside from the conspiratorial nature of the claim (who issued this "instruction", when and why?), that just doesn't add up:
Deaths within 28 days of a test are consistent with certificates
Excess deaths are consistent with certificates
Fatality rate estimates from the UK aren't out of line with other comparative countries.