Coronavirus (2021) thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Question makes perfect sense, but I'm not sure if there's any hard data beyond 12 weeks or so.

If be very surprised if a couple of weeks makes a big difference, but another three months - no idea.

Thanks. I didn't think it would be too detrimental if at all. But I became aware yesterday who mentioned their second jab being around that sort of timescale of 14-15 weeks which is why I wondered.
 
WALES DATA

5 deaths - was 3 last week

1924 cases - was 2504 last week

A good drop in cases,

BUT TECH ISSUES MEAN NO OTHER DATA - EG POSITIVITY - CAN YET BE POSTED APPARENTLY.

I THINK THE UK NEEDS A RETHINK ON WHOEVER SUPPLIES ITS DATA TECHNOLOGY AS THIS HAPPENS FAR TOO OFTEN
 
I haven't read one report saying "multiples" more risk of healthy kids being hospitalised with covid vs vaccinations.
most reports are based on unhealthy kids where there is multiples of risk benefit but in healthy kids the risk is equal or marginally better.


eg here - without even taking into account total attack rate, rather just the upcoming in the next few weeks.


1631619530237.png

I'd be interested in your sources.
 
most reports are based on unhealthy kids where there is multiples of risk benefit but in healthy kids the risk is equal or marginally better.

And the MHRA approval for all 12=15yos, no just those "unhealthy"


The EMA and FDA and several other regulatory agencies have also approved on the same overall risk/benefit basis.

And I think total doses are now into the tens of millions in children worldwide.
 
there is also onward transmission benefits.

both me and my wife are in the the vulnerable category and immuno suppressed and we have a 14 year old at school.

he doesn’t want to pick it up at school and pass it on to either of us . Even though we are double jabbed it could still be nasty for either of us To catch it

he is keen to have it .
Sound like you have brought up a well balanced kid there, they have worked out the non existent risk of COVID to themselves the small risk of rejection to the drug and balanced it out to your high risk ,
 
ENGLAND HOSPITAL DEATHS

This is hopeful news today too after last week's rises.

TUESDAY REMEMBER IS ALWAYS THE BIG CATCH UP DAY BECAUSE OF LACK OF WEEKEND REGISTRATION SO USUALLY THE HIGHEST NUMBER

Today it is:-


142 with 20 North West

Last week was 182 with 21 North West

Week before it was a Bank Holiday so the 24 with 5 was meaningless (it was 196 with 22 the following day - the real catch up number then).

Week before then it was 153 with 16 NW

So today is the lowest number on a Tuesday in a month.
 
ENGLAND HOSPITAL DEATHS MORE DETAIL

BY REGION:-

East 9, London 20, Midlands 24, NE & Yorkshire 41, North West 20, South East 17, South West 11

The highest was 5 in Hull - an area that has been quite high all Summer


NW Trusts: 4 in Salford, 3 in Liverpool, 2 each in Bolton, Lancashire. Pennine Acute (Oldham/Rochdale), Morecambe & Warrington and 1 each in Manchester, Stockport & Wirral.

BY AGE:-

20 - 39 (4), 40 - 59 (13), 60 - 79 (57) & 80 PLUS (68)


SO FAR AFTER A WEEK IN WHICH CASES WERE WELL UP AND HAVE SEEN A BIG RISE IN WEEKLY DEATHS THE NEXT ONE HAS STARTED HAPPILY WELL DOWN ON THERE.

EVERY DAY IN THE PAST 5 DAYS IS DOWN ON THE SAME DAY A WEEK AGO SO FAR.

IT IS STARTING TO LOOK LIKE 3 SEPTEMBER - CURRENTLY ON 104 DEATHS - WILL BE THE PEAK OF THIS WAVE - UNLESS NUMBERS START RISING AGAIN,

NO OTHER DATE SO FAR HAS EXCEDED 96
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.