roubaixtuesday
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 5,778
- Team supported
- City
The problem is that if cases surge again, hospitalisations will too. And there's the danger of driving mutations. So I think we do need low case rates, 1000 seems reasonable to me but of course that's a matter of judgement. However, I'd hope schools could be back before that.
46.7% is very low.The age range of the 315 England deaths is on trend today again.
0 - 19 (1) 0.3%
20 - 39 (3) 0.9%
40 - 59 (27) 8.6%
60 - 79 (137) 43.5%
80 PLUS (147) 46.7%
Much the same pattern with again the over 80s now well uder 50% and very close to the next okdest age group and the under 60s again near 10%.
Don’t know how it could be done, sure there must be a way though. Was speaking to my daughter yesterday and all the staff in her hospital were vaccinated in December, then in the next couple of weeks there were a couple of positive cases but since then none that she knows of. What ‘s hard to know though if that’s the vaccine working (they all had pfizer) which it will be. How would you then know if it’s preventing transmission while still locked down.I can't see behind the Telegraph paywall, but I don't understand how these studies are done. How is the infectivity of those vaccinated reduced? The only obvious way is by tracking overall community infection levels, but there's no way that's been affected yet, vaccination rates far too low. Plus how to deconvolute Pfizer vs AZ when both have been used?
Are we sure they're not reporting protection of the vaccinated rather than infectivity?
Do you think hospitalisation can still surge with the same intensity though, given 95% of over 70s have had one jab?
My understanding is even one jab brings down severity of illness quite some
That would seem to imply it’s still related to their tier 2 nonsense throughout December.Liverpool and Cheshire had the highest NW deaths today.
It never has been consistently.46.7% is very low.
It never has been consistently.
Last time it was this low is in Early Autumn with deaths around 80 - 100 a day in England.
So it is at that level with deaths 3 times as many suggesting more than just statistics involved. And a genuine drop off of maybe around 30/40% in that age range.
Though I may well not understand maths enough for that statement to be true and if it is gibberish please feel free to say so!

Here's the data back to last July. You can see how much more variable it is when total numbers are lower, and also how consistent the trend down since vaccinations started is.
Will be interesting to see where this goes as the 50-80 year old vaccinations kick in. Should rebound, I think.
View attachment 10834
There will still be elderly people dying 'with' Covid but not necessarily because of it I would think. Anyone who has tested positive for Covid within 28 days of death will be counted as a Covid related death even if really it was caused by another illness.
I doubt the effect is big enough to be detectable, and previous numbers suggest there are likely more missed by this measure than inaccurately ascribed to COVID. The chance of an elderly person dying in a given month is small.
The point I was clumsily trying to make (see my edit) was that once more or less all of the adult population has been vaccinated then the most elderly groups will make up more or less all of a far lower number of deaths so they will have increased proportionally even more than at any point so far.
According to this article, they did have an underlying health condition. Still utterly tragic though, of course.A 13 year old with no underlying conditions. Petrifying.
A 13 year old with no underlying conditions. Petrifying.