smithterry813
Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2021
- Messages
- 7
I think that this disease will be for a long time. Despite the fact that vaccinated, I prefer to communicate with people less.
Thank you for the insightI think that this disease will be for a long time. Despite the fact that vaccinated, I prefer to communicate with people less.
Interesting piece from that article:As posted above. there are plenty or reports. they could well be wrong but they are there.
![]()
Deaths Data Shows 80% of South Africans May Have Had Covid
As many as four out of five South Africans may have contracted the coronavirus, indicating that the country may be one of the world’s hardest-hit nations by the disease, the chief actuary at Africa’s biggest health insurer said.www.bloomberg.com
Either ways. we'll know soon enough if the vaccines still work.
the more infectious a virus is the less deadly it is? I'm sure I've read that somewhere before not sure if it's true
If it is, maybe the virus could be getting less deadly as it's trying to survive
They all come from an insurance company estimate, it assumes 90% of excess deaths are COVID and compares data to the UK. I would expect mortality to be higher in SA than the UK as over half the population are poorer, and the assumption that 90% of excess deaths are COVID is at it states. It is a theory but they don't have the data that the UK has and are filling in gaps.As posted above. there are plenty or reports. they could well be wrong but they are there.
![]()
Deaths Data Shows 80% of South Africans May Have Had Covid
As many as four out of five South Africans may have contracted the coronavirus, indicating that the country may be one of the world’s hardest-hit nations by the disease, the chief actuary at Africa’s biggest health insurer said.www.bloomberg.com
Either ways. we'll know soon enough if the vaccines still work.
That's the massive Omnicron R0 in actionWhere did you see that?
I've only read about the increased risk of reinfection but no correlation with mild symptoms or hospitalization yet.
https://www.reuters.com/world/afric...d-higher-risk-reinfection-omicron-2021-12-02/
Evolutionary pressure is on transmission and immune escape. Any effect on severity is just a byproduct, and could go either way. The effect would be real if the infection were so deadly it killed most hosts, but that's not the case here.
See for instance
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Looking more like an unajusted R0 of around 11Positivity rate 22.4% … blimey
Usually things tend to where they need to be, so a super transmittable virus over many years and many evolutions should be limited in how deadly it is.Probably a really stupid question but from what I understand, the more infectious a virus is the less deadly it is? I'm sure I've read that somewhere before not sure if it's true.
If it is, maybe the virus could be getting less deadly as it's trying to survive?
Not quite true. Many thousands are getting a headache and a runny nose for a few days. You only get tested if you're not well (showing more symptoms than that) and you only get hospitalised if you're very ill etc.R rate appears to be the highest it has been in South Africa.
"The reproductive number rose to 2.33 in Gauteng, Michelle Groome, head of health surveillance for the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, said on an online presentation on Friday. That means each infected person on average infects another 2.33."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-rate-measure-at-record-in-s-africa-epicenter
The average life span is 64.13 years in SA so the most vulnerable in the human population just aren't alive to infect.Well the fatality rate is incredibly low then, which would raise the question why we are bothering with restrictions at all when it is such a mild virus.
Not true - viruses are MORE LIKELY to become more infectious and less virulent immediatrly after crossing species barriers. Killing the host is simply not a good evolutionary practice.Evolutionary pressure is on transmission and immune escape. Any effect on severity is just a byproduct, and could go either way. The effect would be real if the infection were so deadly it killed most hosts, but that's not the case here.
See for instance
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
Not true - viruses are MORE LIKELY to become more infectious and less virulent immediatrly after crossing species barriers. Killing the host is simply not a good evolutionary practice.
Once established in a species then what you say is true.
They all come from an insurance company estimate, it assumes 90% of excess deaths are COVID and compares data to the UK. I would expect mortality to be higher in SA than the UK as over half the population are poorer, and the assumption that 90% of excess deaths are COVID is at it states. It is a theory but they don't have the data that the UK has and are filling in gaps.
There could be a million and one reasons why the count is lower there, less health care meaning not as many people being older and having co morbidities as they are already dead from them for example, lack of tracking in some areas etc, lots of people dont even know the procedures for registering a death over there so there could be lots of unregistered deaths.
do some digging for yourself and see if you can find out why SA deaths look lower.
With a reported IFR of 1% in the unvaccinated, there would be 600,000 deaths, it just doesn’t add up I’m afraid.
If the R rate is anything like reported, which I doubt, delta will be gone in a month!Gotta be careful with that; the relative advantage vs delta is a combination of Ro and immune escape.
It could well have a lower Ro but still a substantive advantage purely because if immune escape.
See eg
View attachment 31018
from