Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 20,902
Excellent news mateIt’s a strange choice of word in the headline yes but the point is that it was unexpected given half the country just had covid. Either way it’s good news.
Excellent news mateIt’s a strange choice of word in the headline yes but the point is that it was unexpected given half the country just had covid. Either way it’s good news.
And the people who were at most risk of dying, the sick elderly, have already died?I’m not sure why the Express refer to the reduced mortality in January as a “Bombshell”. Wasn’t the weather pretty mild in January? Aren’t the vast majority of people just getting on with their lives and there are virtually no restrictions?
I think this puts it well.
Rather than celebrate getting back to an old normal which can never exist, we should instead forward and aim for a new normal.
That can be better than the old normal and reduce the risk of covid returning as a major problem, but only if we deliberately make the right choices rather than closing our eyes and hoping it's gone away.
“More severe than Flu” is most certainly debatable for Omicron though and isn’t borne out by U.K. data.
This thread might as well be titled: "Why I'm so desperate to maintain my recently gained position of influence and the financial benefits it provides"I think this puts it well.
Rather than celebrate getting back to an old normal which can never exist, we should instead forward and aim for a new normal.
That can be better than the old normal and reduce the risk of covid returning as a major problem, but only if we deliberately make the right choices rather than closing our eyes and hoping it's gone away.
“More severe than Flu” is most certainly debatable for Omicron though and isn’t borne out by U.K. data.
This thread might as well be titled: "Why I'm so desperate to maintain my recently gained position of influence and the financial benefits it provides"
From what I've seen, that's definitely not the case.
Eg
So interested to hear your source.
Instead, reverse it and say we’ll be back to normal unless X happens
I don’t disagree. Selling it is vital though. Try to limit how much change people will have to endure. Focus on how much better it is now than in 2020-1.I can see where you're coming from, but I think there will be major and enduring change, and in ways it's impossible to predict.
Some of the following will likely happen. Some are (to me) desirable, some debatable and some very undesirable. I don't know at all what will pan out, but the upheaval has been so large, I do think there will be major changes. Perhaps some would have happened anyway, but have been accelerated.
- much more investment in healthcare
- permanent shift to more online retail
- normalising of mask wearing as in SE Asia pre pandemic
- major changes to working patterns, particularly for office workers
- the demise of cash transactions
- move away from global supply chains
- rise of economic and political nationalism
- youth uprising against economic system excluding them from societal wealth.
- changes to school and university learning and assessment.
Doubtless many more possibilities.
Another one is reduction in foreign holidays and that may also link in to the climate change pressures. The world, and society, is always changing - sometimes it is gradual and incremental and sometimes, like now, it happens very quickly. It isn't always a bad thing, even if it is uncomfortable at times.I can see where you're coming from, but I think there will be major and enduring change, and in ways it's impossible to predict.
Some of the following will likely happen. Some are (to me) desirable, some debatable and some very undesirable. I don't know at all what will pan out, but the upheaval has been so large, I do think there will be major changes. Perhaps some would have happened anyway, but have been accelerated.
- much more investment in healthcare
- permanent shift to more online retail
- normalising of mask wearing as in SE Asia pre pandemic
- major changes to working patterns, particularly for office workers
- the demise of cash transactions
- move away from global supply chains
- rise of economic and political nationalism
- youth uprising against economic system excluding them from societal wealth.
- changes to school and university learning and assessment.
Doubtless many more possibilities.
From what I've seen, that's definitely not the case.
Eg
So interested to hear your source.
That’s omicron is it? Because I specifically stated omicron and your source doesn’t seem to be speaking just about omicron.
So let’s use average death mortality rates then. Oh what’s that? January 2022 saw a below average amount of deaths despite 6m estimated omicron infections? How’s that as a measure of lethality?The case fatality rate is a very poor measure of lethality. Ascertainment (what proportion of cases are discovered) can easily overwhelm underlying disease severity.
And it also takes no account of prevalence. A high CFR is overwhelmed by a disease with lower cfr but higher incidence.
I made a statement, you asked for a source. I provided it, it ruins your argument so you’ve decided you don’t like it. I really couldn’t give a shit. Anyone that would rather have Flu than Omicron (after 3 jabs) would be very foolish and there’s zero data to disagree with that.
I think this puts it well.
Rather than celebrate getting back to an old normal which can never exist, we should instead forward and aim for a new normal.
That can be better than the old normal and reduce the risk of covid returning as a major problem, but only if we deliberately make the right choices rather than closing our eyes and hoping it's gone away.
Rather than engage in mind reading on motivations, it might be more interesting to state which parts of this you disagree with, and why.
Blocked that weirdo on Twitter ages ago, one of the most morbid on there.