Should of added a sell on clause. A lot of big Spanish clubs are after him.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Could Pedro Porro be a long-term replacement for Walker?
- Thread starter PepGuardiola
- Start date
Should of added a sell on clause. A lot of big Spanish clubs are after him.
birchwoodgingerste
Well-Known Member
They have 45mill euros.Should of added a sell on clause. A lot of big Spanish clubs are after him.
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
% of the sell on fee. not the release clause.They have 45mill euros.
In terms of ability he is a "Pep"-fullback. But the thing is Cancelo is also a rightback that suits Pep. Also, if you want to replace Walker, like for like, it's almost impossible because he's a freak of nature. Although, Porro's bb is only 20m ish i'd take the gamble and switch Cancelo over to the left.
In terms of ideal Walker-replacements i can only see Reece James as the closest thing. And that is impossible to pull off.
In terms of ideal Walker-replacements i can only see Reece James as the closest thing. And that is impossible to pull off.
Easier to pull off Reese Witherspoon!In terms of ideal Walker-replacements i can only see Reece James as the closest thing. And that is impossible to pull off.
No necessary. In effect we have a sell on clause of 55.5%.% of the sell on fee. not the release clause.
If someone wants to activate his release clause (45m) then we activate our buy back option for (20M) then sell to the club that was prepared to activate the release clause.
So we would make 25M out of his 45M release clause.
Mathematically, yes, but I'm not sure why a player would agree to sign for us on the knowledge that he was going somewhere else just to help us and screw his current club out of £25m....?No necessary. In effect we have a sell on clause of 55.5%.
If someone wants to activate his release clause (45m) then we activate our buy back option for (20M) then sell to the club that was prepared to activate the release clause.
So we would make 25M out of his 45M release clause.
Blue Smarties
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 26,988
Bonuses.Mathematically, yes, but I'm not sure why a player would agree to sign for us on the knowledge that he was going somewhere else just to help us and screw his current club out of £25m....?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
You can't do that in the same window for certain, I'm not sure we would anyway.No necessary. In effect we have a sell on clause of 55.5%.
If someone wants to activate his release clause (45m) then we activate our buy back option for (20M) then sell to the club that was prepared to activate the release clause.
So we would make 25M out of his 45M release clause.
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
Mathematically, yes, but I'm not sure why a player would agree to sign for us on the knowledge that he was going somewhere else just to help us and screw his current club out of £25m....?
Both the player and the buying club wouldn’t give a hoot.
The buying club would always need to pay €45M so the only difference would be that they’d pay the majority of it to us.