I think you have to factor the two things Into the equation to get your percentage of dying
the chances of getting covid In the first instance ; and
having got it the chances of dying of it
that gives you your true risk factor of dying of covid as a healthy under 65
I think the reason I'm very slightly more optimistic is because we normally see a surge in numbers in midweek but that's not happened this week. It could simply be the bank holiday delay but I'm sure we will find out soon enough.
This discussion reminds of the speech made by the German priest. 'first they came for the socialists but I didn't speak up because I wasn't a socialist then....'
Everybody should be protected during this time. If we say they are old, they've had their lives, who next? The poor? The immigrant?
Is that a statement or a question?Healthy under 65 is 0.02%?
100+ were from Sunday, 200+ were from MondayI really hope that includes the weekend figures. If so, then better than could be expected etc.
Most people near the 65 figure have something wrong with them don't they? The underlying health condition notation after death is a bit thin as well, the research online I have done has shown me that heart disease, diabetes and high blood pressure are big contributing factors in this virus killing you percentage wise. Obesity has also been mentioned.
Most people I know have what's classed as underlying conditions so they'd be very wary of contracting the virus, it's a bit like Russian roulette bud.
I know it is and individually you can choose to do more to protect yourself . Just because shops open doesn’t mean people have to go.
The numbers of healthy young people dying of this are tiny. This virus is dangerous to the elderly and those with health issues. So when the lockdown is released those in the vulnerable groups should continue to be shielded. Everyone else should continue to take sensible precautions.I agree with that but the issue I raised with you is that nobody seems to know what the underlying causes are, if this lockdown is genuinely limiting the spread of the virus then coming out of lockdown will cause death rates to soar wouldn't they?
If there are more cases (I am just guessing here) then the "Not at risk" members of the population are putting everyone else at risk just by living their lives as normal.
So until the powers that be get a handle on this we should very much err on the side of caution no?
I agree with that but the issue I raised with you is that nobody seems to know what the underlying causes are, if this lockdown is genuinely limiting the spread of the virus then coming out of lockdown will cause death rates to soar wouldn't they?
If there are more cases (I am just guessing here) then the "Not at risk" members of the population are putting everyone else at risk just by living their lives as normal.
So until the powers that be get a handle on this we should very much err on the side of caution no?