kevin horlocks wand
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Mar 2016
- Messages
- 9,648
Its a risk that isn't necessary, particularly as we are close to vaccinations starting
well then stay in your house don’t go out and you will be fine.
Its a risk that isn't necessary, particularly as we are close to vaccinations starting
Dont be ridiculous, that is your stock arguementwell then stay in your house don’t go out and you will be fine.
I'm not taking sides here, but the key word there is "designated".Because you are in an area designated higher risk than where you are visiting.
Have a look at hosp admissions, icu and deaths, test number are unreliable, i am not surprised at you, sadly
Dont be ridiculous, that is your stock arguement
I'm not taking sides here, but the key word there is "designated".
As I pointed out earlier there is more risk of him taking it back there (from a waiter(ess) passing it on), than bringing it out and staying within his own "bubble".
This whole tier thing is a nonsense I'm afraid, and it should be being reviewed more often than fortnightly, because a tier 3 area might be moved to tier 2 next week, and cases there could be on the rise again by the time it takes effect (a week later).
At the very least I would expect from anyone thinking of doing what you want would be to ask the proprietors would it be OK for you to visit.
I know you wont because he will correctly tell you do fuck off. So you will go anyway and say nowt I suspect
Juvenile responsewell then stay in your house don’t go out and you will be fine.
I'm not excusing anyone, the current system is a complete nonsense, and I've explained why. Cases are important, and that's why each health authority has a pop score, and you can see the trend daily and weekly in the stats of cases.Those are the rules and based on more than cases, dont excuse the its only flu crowd