gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Deploying the term ‘zero difference’ is absurd. Different people making the decisions would have led to different outcomes; possibly ‘better’, possibly ‘worse’. This is manifest. In fact, what your statement implies that if someone had been making the decisions with the intention of causing more harm to the population it would have made zero difference as the other factors to which you referred were so overwhelming in force that governmental input and leadership would have had no impact on the outcome. This is clearly nonsense.Population density + Too many dickheads + A failure to use mobile phone technology to enforce isolation (it breaches human rights and data privacy rules apparantly) + Baked in PHE and NHS incompetence for the most part.
Changing the team on the bridge would make zero difference
Perhaps the truth is that all those factors, along with the quality (or otherwise) of governmental decision making, made a difference.