Uncle Wally One Ball
Well-Known Member
Same. Dont like it at all
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Cricket Thread
- Thread starter Gabriel
- Start date
cleavers
Moderator
I hadn't realised that had started already, thanks for the reminder that "real" cricket still goes on, missed yesterdays defeat.The only good thing about it is the 50 over one day cup tournament.
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,251
Took the day off for a marvellous day out at Sedbergh yesterday (though Lancs performance was underwhelming).The only good thing about it is the 50 over one day cup tournament.
You get to watch some youngsters get blooded and it’s fun to watch now it’s on YouTube.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,714
Bohannon aside! Might have won had Jennings not run himself out.Took the day off for a marvellous day out at Sedbergh yesterday (though Lancs performance was underwhelming).
Singh looked okay with the bat too.
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,251
Yes, it was all about one superb innings and one run out/quality bit of fielding. Thing is, Durham had a number of good knocks though. I thought some of our bowling was wayward and ‘uneven’ - and that’s being kind.Bohannon aside! Might have won had Jennings not run himself out.
Singh looked okay with the bat too.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,714
Not been convinced by Aspinwall nor Blathereick so far from what I’ve seen.Yes, it was all about one superb innings and one run out/quality bit of fielding. Thing is, Durham had a number of good knocks though. I thought some of our bowling was wayward and ‘uneven’ - and that’s being kind.
We’re a bit one paced too.
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
Did the originals actually get a pick of players, or were they left with all the dregs that nobody else wanted. Absolutely piss poor line up
jimharri
Moderator
Just seen their score (I don't watch that shitshow of a competition). 86? Off 100 balls? That must be one of the lowest totals in the history of the Hundred. I know pitches vary, bowlers can have good days and bad days, ditto batsmen but what would be classed as an okay score off 100 balls; 120 - 140?Did the originals actually get a pick of players, or were they left with all the dregs that nobody else wanted. Absolutely piss poor line up
Did the originals actually get a pick of players, or were they left with all the dregs that nobody else wanted. Absolutely piss poor line up
It looks arguably worse than both the teams fielded in last week's T20 Blast game between Lancashire and Northants... Which shouldn't really happen in a franchise league.
Salt and Hartley on the losing side both times and Willey playing a winning hand in both games.
Just seen their score (I don't watch that shitshow of a competition). 86? Off 100 balls? That must be one of the lowest totals in the history of the Hundred. I know pitches vary, bowlers can have good days and bad days, ditto batsmen but what would be classed as an okay score off 100 balls; 120 - 140?
Well...
The game last week Norhants chased over 200 in a T20. So fag packet maths to me says...
200/20 = 10 runs an over.
10 x 16.4 (100 balls) = 164.
Add 10 runs for being able to attack harder with less overs = 174.
And add between 5-10 runs for having better quality and deeper batting lineups. So I would say something between 179 and 184 on the same pitch.