Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 69,455
Got a feeling we might not make 100 in these conditions.
How was that action ever passed?
No he’s fine under the rules brought out a few years ago. The arm doesn’t have to be 100% straight anymore. Many, many bowlers have that sort of action nowIt looks like it’s bent on the start of delivery but ends up straight it looks very suspect but he’s Indian so there will be little appetite from those commentators who feed at the IPL trough to question it.
I know there’s a degree of flex allowed it just always looks very iffyNo he’s fine under the rules brought out a few years ago. The arm doesn’t have to be 100% straight anymore. Many, many bowlers have that sort of action now
The rule was changed to allow a 15 degree flex to avoid a row with India over Murali, iirc.It looks like it’s bent on the start of delivery but ends up straight it looks very suspect but he’s Indian so there will be little appetite from those commentators who feed at the IPL trough to question it.
I've raised this issue before, and was told that there's not that many alternatives around on the county scene. Now, I'll be honest here; I don't avidly follow the domestic game all that closely, though the blast will pass an evening. So I can't really say, "well; what about x, or y, or z". But if Crawley is the best available, it's a damning indictment of the county scene.Crawley keeps getting picked
I reckon Bethell might be tried as an opener if Crawley continues to fail this summer.I've raised this issue before, and was told that there's not that many alternatives around on the county scene. Now, I'll be honest here; I don't avidly follow the domestic game all that closely, though the blast will pass an evening. So I can't really say, "well; what about x, or y, or z". But if Crawley is the best available, it's a damning indictment of the county scene.
He hardly ever gets a score in the County game either, he's nowhere near the best.I've raised this issue before, and was told that there's not that many alternatives around on the county scene. Now, I'll be honest here; I don't avidly follow the domestic game all that closely, though the blast will pass an evening. So I can't really say, "well; what about x, or y, or z". But if Crawley is the best available, it's a damning indictment of the county scene.
If they don't, maybe worth trying Haseeb Hameed again , currently leading the county averages with an average of 81 scoring 734 runsI reckon Bethell might be tried as an opener if Crawley continues to fail this summer.
I did nearly mention him. He should be on the radar, but he doesn’t seem to play “Bazball”, so not sure he will get a look in. They’d probably pick Jennings ahead of him.If they don't, maybe worth trying Haseeb Hameed again , currently leading the county averages with an average of 81 scoring 734 runs
I remember both Boycott and Barrington being dropped for slow scoring after scoring centuries. Barrington vs NZ I think and Boycott vs India. Boycott was about 103* at the end of day 1 and went on to score about 146. Hardly anyone else got a decent score but that didn’t save the Yorkshire opener.He hardly ever gets a score in the County game either, he's nowhere near the best.
They want quick scorer's above all else, Boycott wouldn't get picked now because of his run rate.
Didn't Botham purposely run him out once because he was scoring slowly?I remember both Boycott and Barrington being dropped for slow scoring after scoring centuries. Barrington vs NZ I think and Boycott vs India. Boycott was about 103* at the end of day 1 and went on to sore about 146. Hardly anyone else got a decent score but that didn’t save the Yorkshire opener.
Did Barrington get 311 in that innings before being dropped? Very vague memory.