Crawley's not exactly an expert at playing a moving ball either though. I'd like to see them give Sibley another chance
I’m not sure. I’d need to see more of the ‘new’ Sibley, but Crawley is unreliable.
Crawley is fine. He’s not great but over the last 3 years he’s averaging about 36, which is fine when you consider he scores quickly, has a great partnership with Duckett that’s hard to bat at because of the height and handedness difference, and when he does get in he can put up a big century.
Duckett and Crawley opening with Root, Pope, Brook, Stokes, Smith and Woakes is the best batting lineup we’ve had in years.
Lacking a superstar bowler is a much bigger problem.
