How so? The Indian captain very clearly said it was a good wicket and if he’d won the toss he would have BATTED FIRST. So how did the toss affect the result today? Australia have just batted, bowled and fielded better (and seemingly done their homework better)They have been well beaten but the winning Toss makes a big difference
That’s Adam ZampaWho's the lady on the Aussie bench? A medic?
Asking for a friend, see?
Sharma said if he’d won the toss he’d have batted first so how does that work?
Yep. They were batting first, regardless of the toss.How so? The Indian captain very clearly said it was a good wicket and if he’d won the toss he would have BATTED FIRST. So how did the toss affect the result today? Australia have just batted, bowled and fielded better (and seemingly done their homework better)
It’s exactly what he said. India were batting first whoever won the toss so stop bleating g about it. The Aussies have (unfortunately) just battered themAm not sure he would its what you say when losing the toss!
They’ll know that they won in spite of them rather than because of them though.The thought of Smith and Warner celebrating is fucking sickening.