The blue phantom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 10,167
Around 10/1What were England's odds when we were 90-something without loss approaching lunch on day two, chasing 224?
Around 10/1What were England's odds when we were 90-something without loss approaching lunch on day two, chasing 224?
30 runs needed with 4 wickets its irrelevant.Played with 10 men in this test.
Happened to many times to be a coincidence. We'll get handed our Arse in Australia.Chasing one of the highest ever 4th innings totals. They aren’t bottlers in the slightest. Too aggressive ? Yes. A bit daft? Yes? Bottlers? Not a fucking chance
It's not fucking football.Hahaha. Down to 10 men and you think we bottled.
Agree about Sunday but, this morning the pressure made them fold.The last word that I would use to describe what we've witnessed yesterday and today.
No real cricket fan is interested in the hundred.
When you see a great series, like this, being shoehorned into 6-7 weeks, the authorities show they really have no idea how to run the game.
Yes we probably will but that’s because they are a lot better than us and we will take too many risks. But we aren’t bottlers, far from it, our mentality makes us better than we are, we fell short today unfortunatelyHappened to many times to be a coincidence. We'll get handed our Arse in Australia.
Don’t blame you, although if me typing something in preparedness (which I then accidentally posted) caused our batsmen to implode then I am more powerful than I thoughtThe ultimate jinx from 300/3 to 367 all out. Sorry, couldn't resist picking on this.
It's not irrelevant. India took 9 wickets in the first innings. Whether you're disappointed or not these are the facts. Playing with ten, missing a bowler, not a bad performance in my book. You can disagree and I respect that.30 runs needed with 4 wickets its irrelevant.
Losing a man for all 5 days is far more detrimental than in 90 mins of football.It's not fucking football.
30 runs with 4 wickets is bottling. Couldn't handle the pressure.
Disagree.Losing a man for all 5 days is far more detrimental than in 90 mins of football.
The whole bowling attack had to change its approach as they needed to preserve energy to bowl Woakes’ overs, rather than bowl at full tilt all the time.
Then Woakes would likely have scored a few runs, so losing him swayed the game firmly in favour of India.
It started swinging round corners, to be fair.Disagree.
We ground it out for four days, great effort.
Needed 30 runs with 4 wickets, call it 3.5 on the last day.
Folded.
They made terrible decisions on the lbws, both folded under pressure. Even though the replay said umpire's call, I doubt the Overton one would have even dislodged the bail!View attachment 164919
There is one in 2027.I need to write to Lancashire so they can explain to me why there isn't another Test Match at Old Trafford until 2028.
Is it a tender system that decides what venues get test matches? Or is there a rota system?There is one in 2027.
The ECB decides.
The tenders were about 15 years ago, when Cardiff started getting them, it ruined it a bit as everyone needed 5 full days to get their money back.Is it a tender system that decides what venues get test matches? Or is there a rota system?
Of course, Lord's and the Oval are looked after!