Cricket Thread

BringBackSwales said:
Nonsense, the bowling has been excellent, and did you see Sciver Brunt’s innings. It takes something to demean a bowling spell like that, against two batters who were getting off the ball with ease
Click to expand...
The vast majority of these games have been dominated by one batter, whilst most of the others scratch around.

India, England x2, Australia have all won by one huge innings in games.

The strike rate against spin vs pace is much lower. Playing pace bowlers is costing some teams.

As far as I can see, I praised her spell, but caveated the conditions. That’s hardly demeaning it.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
The vast majority of these games have been dominated by one batter, whilst most of the others scratch around.

India, England x2, Australia have all won by one huge innings in games.

The strike rate against spin vs pace is much lower. Playing pace bowlers is costing some teams.

As far as I can see, I praised her spell, but caveated the conditions. That’s hardly demeaning it.
Click to expand...
Of course you demeaned it. You said the women could barely hit the ball off the square, which is absolute tosh
 
1760277537232.png

From 294-4 to 330 allout.

India choking hard down the stretch here..

I think Aussies can win this.. but just like cricket.. anything can happen..

The Aussies did a wonderful job of bowling slow balls and got the Indian batters out. Lets see if India learns their lesson or just pedal to the metal max pace bowling.
 
KS55 said:
I think that while speed and strength play a part in cricket, skill is easily the most important factor and this means women can be very good cricketers.
Click to expand...

Ofcourse they can be..

Here's 2 awesome bits of skill that men's game has absolutely nothing on!



 
Blue_Lightsaber said:
View attachment 172053

From 294-4 to 330 allout.

India choking hard down the stretch here..

I think Aussies can win this.. but just like cricket.. anything can happen..

The Aussies did a wonderful job of bowling slow balls and got the Indian batters out. Lets see if India learns their lesson or just pedal to the metal max pace bowling.
Click to expand...

Yep Aussies win with an over to spare!

Interesting stat.. 23% of aussie balls to Indian batters were off speed but Indian bowlers only bowled 3% off speed balls to Australia.

Shooting themselves in the foot right there!

1760300755013.png

1760300771565.png

India should have batted the full 50 overs and not thrown wickets away. Top order did a solid job, but the rest of the team didn't.

And most importantly.. used more speed change ups in bowling.. 3% of balls being slow speed is ridiculous at world cup level.
 
Last edited:
BringBackSwales said:
How many overs do England need to bowl for this to be a result? Not that we deserve rain to save us
Click to expand...

Rain did save England tho..

That was just a strange game.. no one even made 20.

Well India up next and they're not exactly firing on all cylinders.. but are coming off back to back losses so will be highly motivated to turn it around.

Even if England lose the next one.. they'll still be joint top of the table.
 
BTW I stand corrected.. I said weird game no one got 20.. Seems Charley Dean was the lone exception batting till 33
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top