northstandgiveusasong
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2015
- Messages
- 867
We'll worry about that then. Now is much more pressing than in 2 years time.I want Ronaldo but won’t we be back to square 1 in two years
We'll worry about that then. Now is much more pressing than in 2 years time.I want Ronaldo but won’t we be back to square 1 in two years
I was just picking a quality looking 11 and squeezed in Grealish, I'd rather Bernardo started with his Portugese colleague aswell if possible ;)Same 1 but there's a 94 Torres that is if you're trying to get the highest rated City squad?
square one is the root of all evil, welcome to the dark-side of the force!Worry about that then
Without a striker we're not even at square 1 now
Uve changed your tune you didn't want him anywhere near cpl of hours ago lolDoesn't sound like we're bringing anyone in. Disappointing. And we could have had Messi. We passed him up in favour of Kane and now Kane isn't coming and Lukaku is at Chelsea. Sorry but unless we bring Ronaldo in by Tuesday, then this window has been managed just about as badly as any I can recall. Joke.
If Torres and Delap had cost £100m would that have been better?Looks like Torres and Delap, combined cost of what, £20m odd and two youngsters to develop.
Still exciting as always at City.
You could be right mate. His ego has done us last 2 champions league so wouldn’t be surprised .Rival fans keep saying he won the 2 champions league trophies because he had Messi and it has got to his head. Anyway, thats my theory and that's the reason he would rather complete the season without a striker rather that sign the 5 times champions league winner Ronaldo in my opinion.
I didn't read his post as sarcasm myself.If Torres and Delap had cost £100m would that have been better?