Dani Olmo

We might not want to pay his release clause,
A slightly higher fee paid over a number of years would help with PSR.
I’m also thinking he be a perfect replacement for Bernardo should he move on.
 
Haaland94 said:
His release clause expires on the 20th, though. We only have a few days to do it.
Click to expand...
We acan still negotiate with RB Leipzig after his RC expires. Might have to pay a bit more for Olmo, but we have a good relationship with them and just got the Gvardiol transfer done last summer.

Point is we can't bring in Olmo until we've sorted out our current squad.
 
bluegonads said:
We might not want to pay his release clause,
A slightly higher fee paid over a number of years would help with PSR.
I’m also thinking he be a perfect replacement for Bernardo should he move on.
Click to expand...

For p&l purposes his fee will be amortised across the length of his contract.

If we pay £50m all at once and sign him on a 5 yr contract then that's £10m a year expensed to the books.

If we pay them £100m over a hundred years then it's still £20m a year in the books over a 5 year contract.

A higher fee over more years might ease cashflow but I don't think we have a problem with that. A higher fee is a higher fee regardless and would impact PSR negatively.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.