David Luiz

If there is anything in this, our transfer plan is becoming desperate, he's no better than any player we already have and £30 mil, really?
 
Pigeonho said:
Rammy Blue said:
i8rags said:
No debate as every news outlet says rejected.

But they left him out last night so not rejected out of hand, might just be tinkering over final fee?
He was injured last night, he tweeted it in the morning he was gutted to miss the game. I know that as TS mentioned it and said Cahill would be his replacement.

see above, says he was left out and fined for the tweet.
 
Rammy Blue said:
I rate Luiz, always have done, and think he would be a decent purchase.

Given a choice between him and Martinez I'd definitely plump for Luiz.

Bob will like his versatility, pretty sure he could play in front of the defence as well.

I agree with the point about potentialy being a defensive mid. Good option in my book
 
Actually, thinking about it, it's probably the sun twisting the story. He will have been fined for tweeting about being injured prior to the game as it was telling the opposition. Usual shitty media making out he was lying and that he was axed.
 
Pigeonho said:
mike channon´s windmill said:
It stinks of that coont Abrahamovic trying to destablise us through his bent cocksucking media pals. A typical bullying Ruskie trick
? How would it destabilise us?

... Further more evidence that our money has blacklisted us in the transfer market?
 
The_Mo said:
Andouble said:
BlueGun said:
I'm I the only one who actually rates him?

I think he'll be a star in a few years.

He's clumsy and out of position a lot, but yes, agreed, within another season he'll be one of the best CBs in Europe.
I really like him as well, he's a bit rash with his challenges though

Similar to Zabaletta, who has improved considerably over the last season.

Personally I think Luiz would make a cracking DM.

Not read past page 3, apologies if it's already been posted.
 
Wow this really has to be the biggest pile of horse shite yet!

£30m for a player that is worth £10m at most

Why on eaerth would chelsea reject £30m bid for someone that is a complete liability

Its actually embarrassing that they have put this in their paper
 
alky313 said:
Pigeonho said:
mike channon´s windmill said:
It stinks of that coont Abrahamovic trying to destablise us through his bent cocksucking media pals. A typical bullying Ruskie trick
? How would it destabilise us?

... Further more evidence that our money has blacklisted us in the transfer market?
Hasn´t blacklisted those Chavski fookers though has it?
We have to foster a total siege mentality coz we´re gonna need it
Ferguscum did it now it´s our turn
 
Rammy Blue said:
BLUEMOONISRISING said:
Rammy Blue said:
But they left him out last night so not rejected out of hand, might just be tinkering over final fee?

He was injured last night mate

The gist I got was that he wasn't injured, says in the article that he was left out and has been fined for tweeting that he was injured.

-- Thu Aug 23, 2012 8:47 am --

i8rags said:
Rammy Blue said:
But they left him out last night so not rejected out of hand, might just be tinkering over final fee?
Smokescreen mate.
Although he ain't dog shit, he flatters to deceive.

smokescreen for DDR?
Of course.
 
Cheadle Blue said:
Wow this really has to be the biggest pile of horse shite yet!

£30m for a player that is worth £10m at most

Why on eaerth would chelsea reject £30m bid for someone that is a complete liability

Its actually embarrassing that they have put this in their paper

This all day long. Ridiculous bullshit non-story even by the Sun's lamentable standards.
 
mike channon´s windmill said:
alky313 said:
Pigeonho said:
? How would it destabilise us?

... Further more evidence that our money has blacklisted us in the transfer market?
Hasn´t blacklisted those Chavski fookers though has it?
We have to foster a total siege mentality coz we´re gonna need it
Ferguscum did it now it´s our turn
You'll have to explain more. Maybe i'm being a little thick or something, but 'siege mentality' over a rejected transfer - i'll reword that. 'Siege mentality' over a rumoured rejected transfer?
Not sure what you are getting at to be honest.
 
I have it on good authority that City are already paying his wages.
(Mod's please add to threasd title!)
I am ITK - I know what size paintbrush Helen Flanagan used to apply her make-up.
 
mike channon´s windmill said:
alky313 said:
Pigeonho said:
? How would it destabilise us?

... Further more evidence that our money has blacklisted us in the transfer market?
Hasn´t blacklisted those Chavski fookers though has it?
We have to foster a total siege mentality coz we´re gonna need it
Ferguscum did it now it´s our turn

This total siege stuff is tough... We don't live in a pretty city. We have a starting XI that can be named by most in Europe as well. Every time we enter the market we face full on inflation.
 
mike channon´s windmill said:
It stinks of that coont Abrahamovic trying to destablise us through his bent cocksucking media pals. A typical bullying Ruskie trick

LOL it has probably been leaked by City in an attempt to progress the Martinez deal.
 
Luiz is mistake prone and clumsy. In the chariety shield match he looked out of his depth against Aguero and Tevez. I can't beleive Chelsea paid £22m for him let alone £30.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top