blumoonrises said:
No he isn't... I'd say we've moved it slower while he hasn't been playing.. his passes are fast and decisive, he knows where he's gonna pass the ball before he even wins it.
The above response reeks of bias.
1) we are not talking only about him winning the ball and passing it off. Which in any given game, winning the ball and passing it off, forms a small portion of when he passes. I doubt there is any game in which his winning and then passing off the ball forms more than 30% of times when he actually passes. A sure sign that your recollection is already biased if it focuses strictly on that.
2) The slowness being discussed is not in regard to the speed of his pass, but the speed of the team transitioning from defense to offense. No one doubts that we pass it a lot, often the question is whether we move it at such a slow and disjointed clip, that it affords the opposition time to reform.
3) Whether De Jong's passes are fast and decisive (itself an arguable claim, but even if we assumed it were true) does not affect the claim of a slowed down offense if the passes are made to a disadvantaged teammate. T
4) The claim here is that in the last 2 games De Jong's decisions often didn't foster offense. Wholesale claims such as we passed it slower when he didn't play are often fallacious. And even if they were true, this doesn't absolve him of the claim of moving it slower when he did play. I mean it is possible the
chemistry dysfunction caused by his backup makes it even worse than when he doesn't play, but this still doesn't mean he is not slowing the play down. These are not mutually exclusive ideas.
For example, If De Jong is slowing City's play down and he is replaced by ME, it is most likely that the play will slow down even more, yet this doesn't change the fact that De Jong slows the play down!!! It just suggests that I am worse than De Jong. No one has claimed any backup on the bench is better, but it doesn't change the actual claim about what he does.